Viewing profile — taliesinb
taliesinb
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Jul 25, 2010, 5:32 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,461
- Public activity
- 789 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About taliesinb
https://tali.link
https://twitter.com/taliesinb
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47527068
Interesting. It all seems very brittle, though. And that something has gone very wrong with our ecosystem of tools, languages, and processes when it becomes advisable to massage so…
-
comment
Comment #47433960
Amusingly, you need only have circuits of prime depth, though you should probably adjust their widths using something principled, perhaps Euler's totient function.
-
comment
Comment #47433916
And i bet these would be useful in initial and final parts of transformer too. Because syntactic parsing and unparsing of brackets, programming language ASTs, etc is highly recursi…
-
comment
Comment #47433868
There is an obvious implication: since the initial models were trained without loops, it is exceedingly unlikely that a single stack of consecutive N layers represents only a singl…
-
comment
Comment #46053534
If you could link to where this is implemented I'd be very grateful!
-
comment
Comment #46050530
Hello! Yes I am curious, how does one deal with cycles in the code hash graph? Mutually recursive functions for example?
-
comment
Comment #45613843
I’ve been super interested in these kinds of cosmic turduckens. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thorne%E2%80%93%C5%BBytkow_obj... and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasi-sta…
-
comment
Comment #44687005
Given that whole name binding thing is ultimately a story of how to describe a graph using a tree, I was primed to look for monoidal category-ish things, and sure enough the S and …
-
comment
Comment #41058125
Yes, this is a very cool story. But, fascinatingly, integration does in fact have a meaning. First, recall from the OP that d/dX List(X) = List(X) * List(X). You punched a hole in …
-
comment
Comment #40941529
Cool! Looks pretty professional. I explored a similar idea once (also implemented in Python, via decorators) to help speed up some neuroscience research that involved a lot of hype…
-
comment
Comment #40860692
The end-game is just dissolving any distinction between compile-time and run-time. Other examples of dichotomies that could be partially dissolved by similar kinds of universal aci…
-
comment
Comment #40612502
An earnest question: can you elaborate on what Zig got wrong in that respect?
-
comment
Comment #40578187
In another life!
-
comment
Comment #40578170
Yes, get in touch with me.
-
comment
Comment #40564574
Symbolica.ai | London, Australia | REMOTE, INTERNS, VISA We're trying to apply the insights of category theory, dependent type theory, and functional programming to deep learning. …
-
comment
Comment #40187741
No worries! Yes, exactly. It's also similar to doing arithmetic with and without units. Sure, you can do arithmetic without units, but when you are actually working with real-world…
-
comment
Comment #40183970
Looks interesting, but your link is broken, can you try again or give us a direct PDF or Arxiv link?
-
comment
Comment #40183943
Thanks for highlighting XArray in your other comments. Yup, XArray is great. As are Dex and the various libraries for named axis DL programming within PyTorch and Jax. I never said…
-
comment
Comment #40183379
While I applaud the OP's exposition, imagine that instead of having axis names live as single-letter variables within einsum, our arrays themselves had these names attached to thei…
-
comment
Comment #39966463
Hey there, a bit late but I've read your other comments and I'd like to get in touch. I happen to be very focused on type derivatives, in the context of applying category theory to…
-
comment
Comment #38694229
That is an excellent explanation full of great intuition building! If anyone is interested in a kind of tensor network-y diagrammatic notation for array programs (of which transfor…
-
comment
Comment #38551461
Amazing, but that's a lot of channels for a cheap oscilloscope. I'm curious how he did that, I don't see any wiring. Also, he missed an opportunity to bring in the rudiments of tra…
-
comment
Comment #38513983
Wow, I love the interactive wizzing around and the animation, very neat! Way more explanations should work like this. I've recently finished an unorthodox kind of visualization / e…
-
comment
Comment #38329076
QE did not lead to historically high levels of inflation. Most of the money stayed in the financial sector, on banks balance sheets.
-
comment
Comment #38329040
I guess we should distinguish money from commodities, though? For money to mean something different to commodities, it must enjoy a privileged legal and social role, by virtue of i…