Viewing profile — ta_wh
ta_wh
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Dec 02, 2016, 4:05 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 28
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About ta_wh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #16059716
I'm no lawyer, but my instincts tell me someone would have to prove that the chips today do not conform to Intel's specs, and that this difference is such that the CPU no longer "s…
-
comment
Comment #16059597
See the three-year warranty here for boxed CPUs: https://www.intel.com/content/dam/support/us/en/documents/pr... Note the first bullet under "WHAT THIS LIMITED WARRANTY DOES NOT CO…
-
comment
Comment #14457815
I think the user (bogomipz) was looking for your email contact. Could it be eitally@google.com? [EDIT] According to another Googler in this thread, the address is actually etally@g…
-
comment
Comment #13758822
Think you're mistaken, I don't have downvote privileges!
-
comment
Comment #13758734
"[RESOLVED] Increased Error Rates Update at 2:08 PM PST: As of 1:49 PM PST, we are fully recovered for operations for adding new objects in S3, which was our last operation showing…
-
comment
Comment #13757985
Wouldn't go that far. It's always been the case in the cloud that if you're not region/provider replicated, you're susceptible to localized outages.
-
comment
Comment #13757675
That's a durability target, not an availability SLA. Durability != Availability.
-
comment
Comment #13147373
I want to see if I can clarify your last point, because it'd be huge if this is true. You're saying that internal pressure has caused HR to drop ProctorU across the SDE/intern pipe…
-
comment
Comment #13134032
As far as I understand, it will have a positive effect on S3's latency, for straightforward reasons. But to what extent? Maybe some BOE calculations might help... Throwing out a gu…
-
comment
Comment #13085929
The link only has listings for senior engineers, are you looking also for junior or new grad candidates?