Viewing profile — szhorvat
szhorvat
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Mar 11, 2008, 7:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 207
- Public activity
- 39 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About szhorvat
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #39962456
I find that the biggest practical issue with using GCC's analyser is that it's just so darn difficult to set it up and have readable output. Have you considered focusing on this a …
-
comment
Comment #39962385
I'm quite surprised to hear this. What do you get from GCC's analyser that Clang's static analyser doesn't already report? I tried to use GCC's analyser several times, but I couldn…
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #19974439
There's lots of ideological discussion here. I would have loved to read some experiences based on actually trying the thing ! You don't have to settle for the command line. It work…
-
comment
Comment #19974388
Now you can give it a try easily. Why don't you? Maybe you will discover a new world ;-) Don't think of Mathematica as a computer algebra system. It is much more than that, fully c…
-
comment
Comment #19974319
For practical purposes, nothing. If you have used Mathematica in the past, and know what it is: the "Wolfram Engine" is basically the Mathematica kernel. Note that this free versio…
-
comment
Comment #19974295
"I’m a representative sample of my fellow software engineers" I'm a bit puzzled about how strongly you seem to be feeling about this topic. Given your comments, you seem to be quit…
-
comment
Comment #8016174
We were considering making http://matlink.org/ compatible with Octave. The feedback I got on this was part of why this wasn't done. To make MATLink user friendly, it needs to come …
-
comment
Comment #8013235
Note that I'm not saying that one can claim that a result is correct, a theorem is true, etc. based on the fact that some undocumented algorithm produced it. That's clearly unaccep…
-
comment
Comment #8013217
I guess it depends on one's field. I've never cited a software I didn't write myself, simply saying trust this software, here's the reference . I wouldn't trust a result from Sage …
-
comment
Comment #8013065
I should add that every time I asked WRI support about implementation details, I did receive an answer with references to the method used.
-
comment
Comment #8013052
My impression is that you don't hate to be that guy, but actually love to express this opinion. Open source systems like Sage always look desirable, simply by virtue of being open …
-
comment
Comment #8013003
You need to get used to the notebook concept. In the end you'll find that it's much more convenient for interactive work than a traditional command line. For non-interactive work y…
-
comment
Comment #7953870
Yes, I agree with you assessment :-)
-
comment
Comment #7951620
"You import someone's changes to a local notebook" <-- there are no existing tools that reliably automate that. (I'm aware of the notebook diff utility in the AuthorTools package, …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #7950874
Notebook interfaces are nice for interactive work (I love the concept and advocate for it), but they're no replacement for an IDE for writing packages. I spend most of my time in t…
-
comment
Comment #7947594
The Front End isn't very good at taking the job of an IDE ... But it is a very good notebook interface (doesn't the notebook concept come from Mathematica originally?). Notebook in…
-
comment
Comment #7935960
It's here: https://billing.wolframcloud.com/pricing.html?p=wpc
-
comment
Comment #7935640
What will it be able to do that Mathematica won't have? (Will Mathematica also have cloud integration?) And what about the Discovery Platform and Data Science platform? How will th…
-
comment
Comment #7934375
Thanks, that explaines it!
-
comment
Comment #7934189
Can anyone enlighten me about why the title of the post got changed? I tried to squeeze all the relevant information in there, to make it easy for people to decide whether they're …