Viewing profile — symtos
symtos
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Apr 07, 2016, 10:43 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 43
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About symtos
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18065141
Another reason is that the official Firefox builds for at least GNU/Linux doesn't employ standard exploit mitigations (stack canaries, position independent code, read-only GOT).
-
comment
Comment #17744500
One of those groups is Global Cyber Allience (GCA): "GCA, a 501(c)3, was founded in September 2015 by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, the City of London Police and the Ce…
-
comment
Comment #17535384
> Quicklisp is de-facto the only widely used library manager in Common Lisp world, and so it’s written in Common Lisp and doesn’t have any tests. It’s a wonder for me how it’s not …
-
comment
Comment #16904532
> In case of Maven - and likely most others - packages are not even digitally signed by the publisher Last time I explored the atrocious state of language-specific package managers…
-
comment
Comment #16554265
The ISP in question is in Turkey, so it should probably be noted that the Turkish government has a root cert trusted by both Mozilla and Microsoft. https://ccadb-public.secure.forc…
-
comment
Comment #16549133
Had a quick glance and your code is littered with unchecked function calls and potential overflows. Also: Cookie:../../../ Where is a file starting with a value that's interpreted …
-
comment
Comment #16277125
https://libreboot.org/faq.html#what-other-firmware-exists-ou...
-
comment
Comment #16277095
> What is the boundary, in digital devices, between hardware and software? It follows from the definitions. Software is the operational part of a device that can be copied and chan…
-
comment
Comment #14102865
it should be noted that nightmare isn't safe for untrusted websites: https://github.com/segmentio/nightmare/issues/1060
-
comment
Comment #12310871
how does debian developers independently building on their machines help? if anything it adds another point of failure. if you trust upstream enough to run their code, you implicit…
-
comment
Comment #12310787
huh? "when will we finally throw away binary uploads" https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00622.html "For instance, when a maintainer uploads a (portable) source packa…
-
comment
Comment #11811283
there was a paper published 2008 on the state of linux/bsd package managers. some of the information is outdated (eg. pacman now signs their packages) however it is probably still …
-
comment
Comment #11795912
not necessarily. there are software emulation -- examples would be W^X on OpenBSD[1] and Grsecurity/PaX on linux[2]. Ubuntu[3] and RedHat[4] also has (partial) NX-emulation thanks …
-
comment
Comment #11666250
you bet? yet in your previous comment you stated it as a fact
-
comment
Comment #11662935
no. did you read the first paragraph? > FreeBSD lacks basic low-level exploit mitigation, such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) the whitepaper you linked was published …
-
comment
Comment #11660881
why not freebsd? the freebsd project seem to focus exclusively on post-attack with jails and trustedbsd mac. fbsd has not implemented any of the modern exploit mitigation technique…
-
comment
Comment #11651710
...and could software deployed to the device by some random who just exploited some well-known security flaw that never got patched, kill people?
-
comment
Comment #11651622
using software with known problems in order to avoid potential problems from an upgrade does not seem like a non-bad decision
-
comment
Comment #11651465
and what about security updates to the snakeoil they sell, eg. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=69...
-
comment
Comment #11577384
stability /or/ security? because a box running code with bugs that may result in a thwarted control flow is the pinnacle of stability? your firewall won't help against socket re-us…
-
comment
Comment #11558561
It should be noted that "The packages and ports collection does NOT go through the same thorough security audit that is performed on the OpenBSD base system." -- http://www.openbsd…
-
comment
Comment #11558541
That's a half-truth. Ideally they would, but they don't. vlc 2.2.1 (CVE-2015-5949) php 5.6.18 (CVE-2016-3142, CVE-2016-3141) firefox 44.0.2 (CVE-2016-1969, CVE-2016-1977, CVE-2016-…
-
comment
Comment #11544544
Using binaries provided by Mozilla is not a good idea (unless they do things differently with the snaps). They are not hardened in any way; ie. no PIE (rendering ASLR pretty much u…
-
comment
Comment #11490917
xombrero depends on webkit. truly minimal? right. oriented towards security? have you not seen how WebKit does security? they wait for dozens of reported vulns before patching/disc…
-
comment
Comment #11446328
And how many times must central repositories be compromised, and vulnerabilities such as this one be disclosed, before people start to realize that /completely/ ignoring the progre…