Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — symtos

symtos

HN member
Joined
Thu, Apr 07, 2016, 10:43 AM UTC
HN karma
43
Public activity
25 items

About symtos

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #18065141

    Another reason is that the official Firefox builds for at least GNU/Linux doesn't employ standard exploit mitigations (stack canaries, position independent code, read-only GOT).

  2. comment
    Comment #17744500

    One of those groups is Global Cyber Allience (GCA): "GCA, a 501(c)3, was founded in September 2015 by the Manhattan District Attorney’s Office, the City of London Police and the Ce…

  3. comment
    Comment #17535384

    > Quicklisp is de-facto the only widely used library manager in Common Lisp world, and so it’s written in Common Lisp and doesn’t have any tests. It’s a wonder for me how it’s not …

  4. comment
    Comment #16904532

    > In case of Maven - and likely most others - packages are not even digitally signed by the publisher Last time I explored the atrocious state of language-specific package managers…

  5. comment
    Comment #16554265

    The ISP in question is in Turkey, so it should probably be noted that the Turkish government has a root cert trusted by both Mozilla and Microsoft. https://ccadb-public.secure.forc…

  6. comment
    Comment #16549133

    Had a quick glance and your code is littered with unchecked function calls and potential overflows. Also: Cookie:../../../ Where is a file starting with a value that's interpreted …

  7. comment
    Comment #16277125

    https://libreboot.org/faq.html#what-other-firmware-exists-ou...

  8. comment
    Comment #16277095

    > What is the boundary, in digital devices, between hardware and software? It follows from the definitions. Software is the operational part of a device that can be copied and chan…

  9. comment
    Comment #14102865

    it should be noted that nightmare isn't safe for untrusted websites: https://github.com/segmentio/nightmare/issues/1060

  10. comment
    Comment #12310871

    how does debian developers independently building on their machines help? if anything it adds another point of failure. if you trust upstream enough to run their code, you implicit…

  11. comment
    Comment #12310787

    huh? "when will we finally throw away binary uploads" https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/02/msg00622.html "For instance, when a maintainer uploads a (portable) source packa…

  12. comment
    Comment #11811283

    there was a paper published 2008 on the state of linux/bsd package managers. some of the information is outdated (eg. pacman now signs their packages) however it is probably still …

  13. comment
    Comment #11795912

    not necessarily. there are software emulation -- examples would be W^X on OpenBSD[1] and Grsecurity/PaX on linux[2]. Ubuntu[3] and RedHat[4] also has (partial) NX-emulation thanks …

  14. comment
    Comment #11666250

    you bet? yet in your previous comment you stated it as a fact

  15. comment
    Comment #11662935

    no. did you read the first paragraph? > FreeBSD lacks basic low-level exploit mitigation, such as Address Space Layout Randomization (ASLR) the whitepaper you linked was published …

  16. comment
    Comment #11660881

    why not freebsd? the freebsd project seem to focus exclusively on post-attack with jails and trustedbsd mac. fbsd has not implemented any of the modern exploit mitigation technique…

  17. comment
    Comment #11651710

    ...and could software deployed to the device by some random who just exploited some well-known security flaw that never got patched, kill people?

  18. comment
    Comment #11651622

    using software with known problems in order to avoid potential problems from an upgrade does not seem like a non-bad decision

  19. comment
    Comment #11651465

    and what about security updates to the snakeoil they sell, eg. https://bugs.chromium.org/p/project-zero/issues/detail?id=69...

  20. comment
    Comment #11577384

    stability /or/ security? because a box running code with bugs that may result in a thwarted control flow is the pinnacle of stability? your firewall won't help against socket re-us…

  21. comment
    Comment #11558561

    It should be noted that "The packages and ports collection does NOT go through the same thorough security audit that is performed on the OpenBSD base system." -- http://www.openbsd…

  22. comment
    Comment #11558541

    That's a half-truth. Ideally they would, but they don't. vlc 2.2.1 (CVE-2015-5949) php 5.6.18 (CVE-2016-3142, CVE-2016-3141) firefox 44.0.2 (CVE-2016-1969, CVE-2016-1977, CVE-2016-…

  23. comment
    Comment #11544544

    Using binaries provided by Mozilla is not a good idea (unless they do things differently with the snaps). They are not hardened in any way; ie. no PIE (rendering ASLR pretty much u…

  24. comment
    Comment #11490917

    xombrero depends on webkit. truly minimal? right. oriented towards security? have you not seen how WebKit does security? they wait for dozens of reported vulns before patching/disc…

  25. comment
    Comment #11446328

    And how many times must central repositories be compromised, and vulnerabilities such as this one be disclosed, before people start to realize that /completely/ ignoring the progre…