Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — syllogism

syllogism

HN member
Joined
Mon, Oct 18, 2010, 4:16 AM UTC
HN karma
3,482
Public activity
711 items

About syllogism

NLP researcher, recently switched to independent developer.

http://honnibal.github.io/spaCy http://honnibal.wordpress.com http://scholar.google.com.au/citations?user=FXwlnmAAAAAJ&hl=en http://github.com/honnibal/ http://github.com/syllog1sm/

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48177660

    It comes up because people are mistakenly conflating consciousness with moral personhood. People want to be talking about whether AI suffers in a morally meaningful way. In non-hum…

  2. comment
    Comment #47552873

    You're going to make life much harder for yourself, not easier, because you'll still need German legal advice but now you need an expensive multi-national lawyer/firm. Anyone cheap…

  3. comment
    Comment #47504850

    Just keeping a lockfile and updating it weekly works fine for that too yeah

  4. comment
    Comment #47504121

    Maintainers need to keep a wall between the package publishing and public repos. Currently what people are doing is configuring the public repo as a Trusted Publisher directly. Thi…

  5. comment
    Comment #47263567

    The corruptions of this administration are legion, but this isn't one of them. Unless you can point to something Lutnick did to create this outcome, I don't see how he had a better…

  6. comment
    Comment #47198696

    Government's free to not like the terms and go with another provider. That's whatever. Government's not free to say, "We'll blow up your business with a false accusation if you don…

  7. comment
    Comment #47198676

    If you think a blue government would even consider threatening to falsely accuse a company of being a supply-chain threat in order to gain leverage in a contract negotiation, you'r…

  8. comment
    Comment #47194639

    The actions of the US government here are openly corrupt. The point of the supply chain risk provisions is to denote, you know, supply chain risks. The intention is not to give the…

  9. comment
    Comment #47194402

    I don't understand how any sort of deal is defensible in the circumstances. Government: "Anthropic, let us do whatever we want" Anthropic: "We have some minimal conditions." Govern…

  10. comment
    Comment #47193209

    You should quit because the only reasonable thing for your leadership to have done is to refuse to sign any agreement with DoW whatsoever while it's attempting to strongarm Anthrop…

  11. comment
    Comment #47193187

    They're labelling Anthropic a supply chain risk, without even the pretense that this is in fact true. They're perfectly content to use the tool _themselves_, but they claim that an…

  12. story
  13. story
  14. story
  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #46079798

    I thought it was a joke? Like the reviewer is saying, "I didn't finish these books".

  17. comment
    Comment #46060943

    If I were a CTO or VP these days I think I'd push for a blanket ban on committing docs/readmes/diagrams etc along with the initial work. Teams can push stuff to a `slop/` folder bu…

  18. comment
    Comment #46060735

    Well, if you take "review the LLM output" in its most general way, I guess you can class everything under that. But I think it's worth talking about the problem in a bit more detai…

  19. comment
    Comment #46057966

    I think LLMs are net helpful if used well, but there's also a big problem with them in workplaces that needs to be called out. It's really easy to use LLMs to shift work onto other…

  20. comment
    Comment #46057778

    Software to date has been a [Jevons good]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox ). Demand for software has been constrained by the cost efficiency and risk of software proj…

  21. comment
    Comment #45648491

    This has been discussed to death but to reiterate here: people have been much too polite about Kramnick's nonsense. Danya and Hikaru are (were) probably the two people in the world…

  22. comment
    Comment #45299738

    In Europe there are legitimate and extremely established services that require you to input your bank login details into something other than your bank's website. It's madness.

  23. comment
    Comment #44874866

    What is "real reasoning"? The mechanism that the models use is well described. They do what they do. What is this article's complaint?

  24. comment
    Comment #44873405

    It's interesting that there's still such a market for this sort of take. > In a recent pre-print paper, researchers from the University of Arizona summarize this existing work as "…

  25. comment
    Comment #44266798

    Like a backup generator for inputs. Makes sense.