Viewing profile — syllogism
syllogism
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 18, 2010, 4:16 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 3,482
- Public activity
- 711 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About syllogism
http://honnibal.github.io/spaCy http://honnibal.wordpress.com http://scholar.google.com.au/citations?user=FXwlnmAAAAAJ&hl=en http://github.com/honnibal/ http://github.com/syllog1sm/
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48177660
It comes up because people are mistakenly conflating consciousness with moral personhood. People want to be talking about whether AI suffers in a morally meaningful way. In non-hum…
-
comment
Comment #47552873
You're going to make life much harder for yourself, not easier, because you'll still need German legal advice but now you need an expensive multi-national lawyer/firm. Anyone cheap…
-
comment
Comment #47504850
Just keeping a lockfile and updating it weekly works fine for that too yeah
-
comment
Comment #47504121
Maintainers need to keep a wall between the package publishing and public repos. Currently what people are doing is configuring the public repo as a Trusted Publisher directly. Thi…
-
comment
Comment #47263567
The corruptions of this administration are legion, but this isn't one of them. Unless you can point to something Lutnick did to create this outcome, I don't see how he had a better…
-
comment
Comment #47198696
Government's free to not like the terms and go with another provider. That's whatever. Government's not free to say, "We'll blow up your business with a false accusation if you don…
-
comment
Comment #47198676
If you think a blue government would even consider threatening to falsely accuse a company of being a supply-chain threat in order to gain leverage in a contract negotiation, you'r…
-
comment
Comment #47194639
The actions of the US government here are openly corrupt. The point of the supply chain risk provisions is to denote, you know, supply chain risks. The intention is not to give the…
-
comment
Comment #47194402
I don't understand how any sort of deal is defensible in the circumstances. Government: "Anthropic, let us do whatever we want" Anthropic: "We have some minimal conditions." Govern…
-
comment
Comment #47193209
You should quit because the only reasonable thing for your leadership to have done is to refuse to sign any agreement with DoW whatsoever while it's attempting to strongarm Anthrop…
-
comment
Comment #47193187
They're labelling Anthropic a supply chain risk, without even the pretense that this is in fact true. They're perfectly content to use the tool _themselves_, but they claim that an…
- story
- story
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #46079798
I thought it was a joke? Like the reviewer is saying, "I didn't finish these books".
-
comment
Comment #46060943
If I were a CTO or VP these days I think I'd push for a blanket ban on committing docs/readmes/diagrams etc along with the initial work. Teams can push stuff to a `slop/` folder bu…
-
comment
Comment #46060735
Well, if you take "review the LLM output" in its most general way, I guess you can class everything under that. But I think it's worth talking about the problem in a bit more detai…
-
comment
Comment #46057966
I think LLMs are net helpful if used well, but there's also a big problem with them in workplaces that needs to be called out. It's really easy to use LLMs to shift work onto other…
-
comment
Comment #46057778
Software to date has been a [Jevons good]( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox ). Demand for software has been constrained by the cost efficiency and risk of software proj…
-
comment
Comment #45648491
This has been discussed to death but to reiterate here: people have been much too polite about Kramnick's nonsense. Danya and Hikaru are (were) probably the two people in the world…
-
comment
Comment #45299738
In Europe there are legitimate and extremely established services that require you to input your bank login details into something other than your bank's website. It's madness.
-
comment
Comment #44874866
What is "real reasoning"? The mechanism that the models use is well described. They do what they do. What is this article's complaint?
-
comment
Comment #44873405
It's interesting that there's still such a market for this sort of take. > In a recent pre-print paper, researchers from the University of Arizona summarize this existing work as "…
-
comment
Comment #44266798
Like a backup generator for inputs. Makes sense.