Viewing profile — suuuuuuuu
suuuuuuuu
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Aug 09, 2025, 8:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 18
- Public activity
- 18 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About suuuuuuuu
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48666560
I envy you that it admitted that rather than simply making up data and lying about it.
-
comment
Comment #48646837
The arguments in the video are mostly misdirected, conflations of related but distinct issues, or (hypocritically) just opinions. Here are the unpacked issues as I see it: 1. Wheth…
-
comment
Comment #48597174
That's how you know it's just for show. A practically equivalent (for Fable) but infinitely more valuable contribution would've been to implement any missing lints as a PR to ruff …
-
comment
Comment #47946729
Your reference here is a 33 year old paper whose quoted observations and theoretical claims are totally out of date. The measured light element abundances are now consistent (and h…
-
comment
Comment #47818133
I think people working on these abstractions would claim that an appropriate abstraction does involve the exact features you mention. Cache hierarchies and vectorization are common…
-
comment
Comment #47818096
See https://arxiv.org/abs/2512.17101 . I've used some of the tools in the stack they describe (and see Sec 2 for an overview of others). JAX/XLA/etc. are somewhat similar, though s…
-
comment
Comment #47806216
Sorry, I wasn't aware of these developments (having abandoned CUDA for hardware-agnostic solutions before 2020). It doesn't change my point anyway, if it's specific to a single ven…
-
comment
Comment #47806024
CUDA is not C++. CUDA for GPU kernels is its own language. That's the actual problem requiring new languages or abstractions.
-
comment
Comment #47806017
CUDA is not C++. CUDA for GPU kernels is its own language. That's the actual problem requiring new languages or abstractions.
-
comment
Comment #47804445
If you think C++ is the best here, then I don't think you've actually worked in this space nor appreciated the actual problems these languages try to solve. In particular because y…
-
comment
Comment #47007625
Don't underestimate the willingness of physicists to skimp on literature review.
-
comment
Comment #46038764
I myself tried a similar exercise (w/Thinking with 3 Pro), seeing if it could come up with an idea that I'm currently writing up that pushes past/sharpens/revises conventional thin…
-
comment
Comment #45318833
The implication was that likely not all of the advice in this article, which was written by biologists, is actually attributable to McCarthy.
-
comment
Comment #45316640
This is certainly too strongly worded to be correct. I use footnotes quite a bit in my papers (physics) as a strategy to handle the "two audiences" problem - that many or most read…
-
comment
Comment #45316447
I think it's just wrong. Related, linked recently here: https://dwest.web.illinois.edu/grammar.html The authors are biologists, so I suspect they're not particularly versed in math…
-
comment
Comment #45315572
I like a lot of the advice here, except > Keep sentences short, simply constructed and direct. Concise, clear sentences work well for scientific explanations. Minimize clauses, com…
-
comment
Comment #45315466
This is certainly the case, but it does make it all the more amusing that the myth > Commas denote a pause in speaking.... Speak the sentence aloud to find pauses. made its way int…
-
comment
Comment #44849832
I would consider replacing my jupyterlab usage with marimo were it less opinionated about workflow - it offers a lot of benefits that aren't tied to its execution model. I like the…