Viewing profile — suprstarrd
suprstarrd
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Feb 02, 2026, 1:26 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 13
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About suprstarrd
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/suprstarrd; my proof: https://keybase.io/suprstarrd/sigs/n_dJSv0s6rwATuR9-6XOhyGzwfGJ816KTPEhLeIq42Q ] HackerSmacker profile: https://www.hackersmacker.org/user/suprstarrd?hs=Ix0LffJSbtgfE4NqLW aspe:keyoxide.org:AIJOC72LKOWD6YWTDWAKLZHGKI
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47356881
I really thought this was talking about the year 2603 at a glance.
-
comment
Comment #47345203
To be clear: the phone is from 2015, not the exploit chain. Related: https://cloud.google.com/blog/topics/threat-intelligence/cor...
-
comment
Comment #46966495
This is at least partially AI-written, by the way
-
comment
Comment #46890980
[dead]
-
comment
Comment #46851998
I vaguely remember this happening with somebody on an Audacity project, so jumping in! I believe this was on a GitHub issue for that project, but the project has since disabled iss…
-
comment
Comment #46851931
I want to start by saying it's good that you are at least taking the time to look for this information! Stay healthily informed. I see this as a bad analogy though: you wouldn't he…
-
comment
Comment #46851873
I can see where they got that idea from. You saying you won't provide permissions at the end ends up sounding a lot more like you won't use the app than I imagine you intended. (Al…
-
comment
Comment #46851424
Speaking as someone who doesn't like the idea of AI art so take my words with a grain of salt, but my theory is that this input method exclusivity is intentional on their part, for…
-
comment
Comment #46851345
It blows my mind that this wasn't the thought process going in. Thank you for doing this!