Viewing profile — supreme_loquat
supreme_loquat
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Dec 14, 2021, 11:51 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 25
- Public activity
- 17 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About supreme_loquat
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48408880
For embouchure mechanics, I'd highly recommend Dave Wilken's blog. That was his doctoral research focus and he's got a good intro to brass embouchures on his blog [0]. The tongue i…
-
comment
Comment #34203521
> Only one person will win anyway, so disappointment about the outcome actually seems like the wrong focus vs eg satisfaction that you got to represent your preferences fairly. Exc…
-
comment
Comment #34203484
Ah when you mention parallelizing I was assuming you were referring to the issue of requiring that ballots all be centralized in order to tally them for IRV, rather than summing at…
-
comment
Comment #34203446
The biggest issue with a proposal like this is that a lack of any preference given whatsoever should not count positively towards a candidate. If someone labels candidate A as +3, …
-
comment
Comment #34199791
It's pretty common to not release the full CVR unfortunately. It makes the process much less transparent and also makes it harder to study how the different voting methods work in …
-
comment
Comment #34199734
> You could have each precinct count the first round This is just centralized tallying with extra steps. You can't finish the first round without results from every precinct, that'…
-
comment
Comment #34199671
> On the other hand, ordinal systems have to be much more coordinated as they are not trivial to parallelize I don't think this is true for all ordinal systems is it? Wouldn't most…
-
comment
Comment #34115097
Congress is totally broken, large bills like this are consistently shoved through and members of congress aren't given the opportunity to even read them before it's voted on. What'…
-
comment
Comment #33124406
> No it does not necessarily mean that, it could plausibly mean that they do have a second preference, but are afraid of giving them points so that they don’t overtake their first …
-
comment
Comment #33124136
You're just repeating the same points without engaging with anything I wrote. You're still making the assumption that the first choice votes are the most important, and ignoring th…
-
comment
Comment #33117742
> it is a stepping stone to proportional representation (achieved by adopting both RCV and multi-member districts), which is much more important than which single-winner voting sys…
-
comment
Comment #33117660
Beating everyone head to head is beating the field. The reason Begich wasn't picked by RCV is because he didn't have enough first choice votes. The problem with your analysis is th…
-
comment
Comment #33117520
Yes, the cast vote record has been released, and Begich wins the head to head vs both Palin and Peltota. [1] is a nice writeup on the election (highly recommend the What's Interest…
-
comment
Comment #29575805
Not sure I'm convinced. They'd have to have their heads totally buried in the sand to not know it's a problem, and as the saying goes, it is difficult to get someone to understand …
-
comment
Comment #29575255
I don't think I wrote that all democrats didn't want to fix this, it was simply an illustration that there are plenty of democrats that don't want to fix it or don't care enough to…
-
comment
Comment #29562034
I did actually touch on it briefly in [1] but it was not my only focus so perhaps you missed it. But I fully agree our voting system is one of the primary reasons for our polarizat…
-
comment
Comment #29550838
> One side invaded the capital building in a violent attempt to overthrow democracy Okay so lumping together half the country in with a few extremists would probably be the first s…