Viewing profile — superposeur
superposeur
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Jul 20, 2021, 5:04 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,205
- Public activity
- 213 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About superposeur
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #48967788
1. An NYT commenter clarifies that the “Second Grade Teacher” of the article’s title is from a family worth $30+ billion. If true, this would seem to be egregious omission of conte…
-
comment
Comment #48804375
Ok got it, thanks.
-
comment
Comment #48800959
I don’t understand the claim that Kolmogorov lower bounds are uncomputable. Three digit strings are unlikely to run as a program so surely 3 is a lower bound on Kolmogorov of the f…
-
comment
Comment #48207797
Hard agree. Railing against the “mainstream media” is such a cliched and, ironically, uncritical mode of argument.
-
comment
Comment #47234266
If this experiment: https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2024arXiv240202618T/abstra... or others like it turn up positive results, MWI is falsified.
-
comment
Comment #47214077
There are several layers of structure here. Indeed, as you say, Decoherence explains why certain bases are special: when a system is in a pointer basis state, it does not continue …
-
comment
Comment #47212469
Yes, except for the “asymmetrically” part. In other words, Many Worlds.
-
comment
Comment #47212435
These debates over the interpretation of Quantum Mechanics (i.e. what ultimately happens when a “measurement” takes place) are important but don’t bear on the effectiveness of quan…
-
comment
Comment #47212368
Yes, the MWI is falsifiable. It asserts that objective collapse does not occur, therefore any observation of objective collapse (such as predicted by GRW or Penrose-Diosi) would fa…
-
comment
Comment #47212174
It doesn’t. Decoherence is the technical step in the Everett picture defining what a “classical branch” even is and explaining how the state vector branches. Every claim that “Deco…
-
comment
Comment #46270957
Can you believe that This is Spinal Tap, The Sure Thing, Stand by Me, Princess Bride, When Harry Met Sally, Misery, and A Few Good Men were all directed by the same man ? What an e…
-
comment
Comment #46180341
The Maple syntax may superficially seem easier but actually leads to more problems in practice. The point of the [ ] is that argument of a function is logically distinct from algeb…
-
comment
Comment #45146872
The introduction to Vol 1 of Weinberg’s Quantum Theory of Fields does this really well, albeit briefly. It feels like getting an “insider’s view” of the historical developments.
-
comment
Comment #45064705
Ok, to be clear, let’s say I’m dumb and accidentally go with the default (I get the color of the opt out button wrong or something). As if there’s a “publish my private emails to t…
-
comment
Comment #45064455
Everyone seems to be unsurprised by this move, but I’m genuinely shocked. What a shoot your own foot business decision. Google, evil though it be, doesn’t post the text of your gma…
-
comment
Comment #45006760
Yes, totally. Relevant study: https://www.media.mit.edu/publications/your-brain-on-chatgpt...
-
comment
Comment #44986343
My path crossed Nguyen many years ago and I can vouch that he is a very smart, nice, ethical, and solid dude who knows his stuff. I’m also a physicist and know enough about the rel…
-
comment
Comment #43946611
Great ep.
-
comment
Comment #43946368
The problem I’ve always had with over-weighting deathbed advice is that dying people rarely think through the counterfactuals involved. What would actually be the consequence of no…
-
comment
Comment #43471827
Agreed, if you look beyond the bro-ey tone of the presentation, it is smart and nontrivial advice he is delivering here. It is so easy to get distracted by complexity (esp with so …
-
comment
Comment #43148049
In any field, what it even means to be good morphs as you go up in skill level. Non mathematicians know only about arithmetic so they often imagine that mathematicians must be real…
-
comment
Comment #42730267
Ha ha, first time I’ve seen another reference to this! Back in the day, I got such a kick out of his description that I began imitating it myself, calling it my “David Lynch Specia…
-
comment
Comment #42206190
It’s worth mentioning that, brilliant as Dirac’s “sea of filled negative energy states” picture was, no one believes that interpretation now. The Dirac equation is better seen as t…
-
comment
Comment #42033954
Truly a vision of dystopia.
-
comment
Comment #41971098
Photons.