Viewing profile — sungam
sungam
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 12, 2007, 4:27 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 396
- Public activity
- 147 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sungam
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47560980
This is fantastic and I would do something similar if I had the same resources. Whole genome sequencing and single cell sequencing are actually surprisingly inexpensive (compared t…
-
comment
Comment #45384112
Performing the procedure requires a high level of skill in interpreting scans (angiograms) in real time.
-
comment
Comment #45370699
In fairness, while I’m sure it didn’t work out for all of them, one of these students became one of the youngest self made billionaires in history
-
comment
Comment #45165658
This is true, however I am sure that AI-based image analysis will also replace some of the work of dermatologists eventually so nobody is safe...
-
comment
Comment #45165647
Not at the present time. I think if the project takes off I will move it to static hosting anyway to reduce the attack surface.
-
comment
Comment #45165639
I think we are going to see more and more people in diverse fields developing applications that meet the requirements of a small niche that may not have been economically viable pr…
-
comment
Comment #45163479
Not tried but my guess is ChatGPT will be quite accurate but get a small proportion wrong. The challenge with skin cancer is that we cannot afford to miss even 1:10,000 cases
-
comment
Comment #45163459
For an experienced front end dev yes - for the average dermatologist no chance!
-
comment
Comment #45163442
This is true - there are more than 2000 different conditions in dermatology but the most important ones to recognise are skin cancers
-
comment
Comment #45163435
There would be no reason to do this - skin lesions removed are almost always sent for pathological analysis even if expected to be harmless
-
comment
Comment #45161848
That's great! I used the publicly available images from the ISIC challenge dataset which are CC licensed.
-
comment
Comment #45161730
Thanks - I'm glad you found it useful! I have been meaning to make it for many years but could never justify the time involved until AI made it possible.
-
comment
Comment #45161718
Yes we call this the "Ugly Duckling" sign
-
comment
Comment #45161712
Yes a doctor would get a history which will help, however I get a high score on these images and another skin cancer doctor that commented also got a high score so in most cases th…
-
comment
Comment #45161701
There are lots of apps that do this. It's (relatively) easy to get AI to perform at the same level of a dermatologist but liability/risk management/regulation is much harder to sol…
-
comment
Comment #45161691
Thanks for your comment - the purpose of this app is patient education rather than diagnosis but I will definitely have a look at the relevant stats in more detail!
-
comment
Comment #45161687
Will add this in next version!
-
comment
Comment #45161684
It is randomized so probably just bad luck! FWIW I get a high score and another skin cancer doctor who commented also gets a high score so it is possible to make the diagnosis in m…
-
comment
Comment #45161438
Thanks for your kind words with regards to the app and well done for getting such a high score!. I agree that BCC is often subtle. My practice is also largely focused on skin cance…
-
comment
Comment #45161281
Thanks for the suggestion I will do this if I can source the images
-
comment
Comment #45161275
Yes I could add this quite easily - will do in the next version
-
comment
Comment #45161267
Lots of models out there but I would not trust any for diagnosis without review of a dermatologist yet. The challenge is unanticipated edge cases and managing risk/liability/regula…
-
comment
Comment #45161241
Sorry - wasn't expecting anyone to use the app or any traction on HN! Will update
-
comment
Comment #45161238
Thanks for this - and thanks for maintaining this incredibly useful resource. What would be the best way to contact you?
-
comment
Comment #45161190
Thanks for this - I need to look at this more carefully