Viewing profile — sumy23
sumy23
HN member- Joined
- Thu, Jun 02, 2022, 3:38 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 377
- Public activity
- 171 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sumy23
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #31886967
Maybe… however in the debate of this law, one side is saying “the law says you need purpose to cause” and the other side is saying “no it doesn’t. If you could read more than 14 wo…
-
comment
Comment #31885604
No one’s 401k was plundered. Most of this was funded by the Federal Reserve via a combination of quantitative easing, low interest rates, and increasing the money supply. The Fed c…
-
comment
Comment #31884775
Does anyone else hate the long tail? Most of the content I consume comes from the long tail. The content itself is interesting and great. I love it. However, consuming long tail co…
-
comment
Comment #31884568
All measurement, but especially so at the quantum scale, involves interacting with the observed subject. One of the observations made by quantum mechanics is that you can't observe…
-
comment
Comment #31884425
Sorry, I’m not understanding what you’re seeing. The law says “purpose to cause” and then lists two things joined by an OR clause. But you’re arguing that the “purpose to cause” la…
-
comment
Comment #31884381
Crypto firms aren’t systematically important, so no bailout is necessary or warranted. This is more like the .com bust than anything else. In both cases, irrational exuberance surr…
-
comment
Comment #31881487
I wouldn’t say heroin addicts act with purpose to cause inconvenience. They do cause inconvenience, but that’s not the purpose of their actions.
-
comment
Comment #31881447
Really? An entire Wikipedia article filled with detailed explanation of the phenomenon and its cause is an appeal to the stone? Really? Sorry, but that is absurd .
-
comment
Comment #31881012
It's always a bit terrifying to me how often I see people on Hacker News confidently asserting some phenomenon can be explained by something that any rational person would recogniz…
-
comment
Comment #31880041
> That won't put the water back. Revenge is just the final form of prioritizing the comfort (or discomfort) of a handful of bad actors over the well-being of the other 99.9999% of …
-
comment
Comment #31880021
It really depends on the specific situation. Public space is for everyone’s enjoyment. Unfortunately, some people take advantage of their right to the space in a way that detracts …
-
comment
Comment #31878082
That's just color commentary from the author of this piece. If you read the rest of the article, the specific changes proposed by the SEC are outlined.
-
comment
Comment #31878075
Your outrage is unwarranted. The proposed changes are: 1) Limiting PFOF because it creates possible conflicts of interest. 2) Limiting "gamification" of trading via engagement prom…
-
comment
Comment #31872591
Those are good examples of inheritance. However, I think they'd be better served with mixins, which is another form of composition.
-
comment
Comment #31871298
First of all, people aren’t pro-abortion. They’re pro-choice. Second, why start defining someone a human at conception? Isn’t birth control depriving a possible person of their rig…
-
comment
Comment #31868796
I think a very legitimate, legal purpose of the technology is for the implementation of financial systems. How many billions of dollars of computers, networks, mainframes, and engi…
-
comment
Comment #31868659
> It is the same argument used to justify any opinion without proof You offered an opinion without proof, which is that Apple wouldn't exist. This is why these "debates" are so unp…
-
comment
Comment #31868389
What does that have to do with control of one's body?
-
comment
Comment #31868362
Have you heard of the butterfly effect? You can't predict what would happen if you go back in time and change something. Maybe Apple wouldn't exist, or maybe it would exist and wou…
-
comment
Comment #31867905
The point you are trying to make is starting to require a lot of caveats. She might be director not a writer, she's a producer not an executive producer, etc. Also, Lim lists herse…
-
comment
Comment #31867517
Again, there is no debate to be had. Those who are against abortion are saying the the fetus has rights. That is unfalsifiable. There is no point in arguing about it. If you questi…
-
comment
Comment #31867258
This article from Vanity Fair does a good job collection the circumstantial evidence surrounding the lab leak theory: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2022/03/the-virus-hunting-no..…
-
comment
Comment #31866835
Class inheritance in OOP seems to be largely derived from such contrived examples as "Duck extends Animal." It's basically a worthless concept and OOP would be better without it. C…
-
comment
Comment #31866559
I don't see why you'd debate that. You could debate what the rights of the mother vs. the rights of the unborn baby are until you're blue in the face and you'd be unlikely to convi…
-
comment
Comment #31864741
> I’ve thought a lot about this, and it does make sense for it to be up to each individual state. Many believe, myself included, that women should have the right to control their o…