Viewing profile — sumodds

I agree and disagree. I am a candidate and prefer coding challenges provided they are reasonable. Meaning, if you are wanting to check the person's ability in x, check the person a…

That is a weak argument :). Not really, there is a certain and rather high possibility that common man can buy Tesla cars. Sure, there is a premium price tag now, since we are stil…

I am not as much against automated trading, as I am against High Frequency Trading. Automated trading itself is still dangerous, in that many of these algorithms are black-boxes. T…

I disagree with this assumption. The problems with military research, law firms, advertisements are of degree not of its existence. Sure, they have their own problems. But we need …

I do Computer Vision/Machine Learning for a living, but would caution a little against super-focusing on a narrow area. AI in general is known for its AI winters, where jobs dry up…

No problem here in Mountain View :)

Wallstreet ;)

I loved the first part of the argument, that many a time causality is not from one source but multiple (often overlapping and even contradictory sources). But towards the end, you …

Not that only, I had a high variance on my bias.. ;)

Lol.. my bad. I did not pay attention. I thought the error was in percentages. (I was comparing with MNIST and somehow assumed this too was percentages). Come to think of it, that …

Am not sure if you can apply winner takes all for such marginal difference in error. Give a slightly different database and things go awry. Check out : "Unbiased Look at Dataset Bi…