Viewing profile — stymaar

Looks like we have a /r/localllama dweller here.

> Fella has read the article Their argument doesn't show that at all though, they make an argument against an age bias when the article explicitly says age is being controlled for.…

> I guess countryside France is still only 2 hours from Paris or Marseille Not at all, it's more like 6 hours if you're in a somewhat remote place, but most taxi trips are way smal…

> There weren't a lot of taxis outside of major cities What? In my country at least (France), taxis have been a thing even in the countryside for as long as cars existed (or rather…

It pains me to see such a low-effort contrarian comment at the top: as stated in TFA taxi drivers are below other profession when controlling for age, and there are multiple profes…

> They may have prioritized growth, Prioritizing growth ? When OpenAI had saturated the market by year one and has only been losing market share for the past 18 months! Again that'…

The key problem is social media feed boosting “engagement”. Balanced, well thought comments don't bring much engagement so they end up being ignored by the algorithm while outrageo…

It's funny because > Take away the huge R&D and they become hugely profitable with a robust ad business like Google Search. Is refuted by the sentence that comes immediately before…

> The real natural law is scarcity. That's the biggest myth of economics. It wasn't even true the pre-modern world except occasionally (famines were a real thing, but they were sti…

From the very link your HN submission points to: > Research and Development: $19.18 billion. Loss from Operations: $20.92 billion OpenAI isn't profitable even if you discount R&D e…

This is obviously AI, but believing in Pangram's output is putting too much trust in a fully broken system.

If you check the submission history of OP, you'll see that they are deep into AI psychosis.

> No they wouldn't have. Low cost isn't no cost, R$D is expensive I'm not talking about R&D. > there are a class of tokenmaxxing users well outside the median (e.g Agentic Coding).…

> Why are Anthropic's and OpenAI's annualized revenue about $50B each? I too can have $50B revenues by selling dollars for 50 cents each, and in the process I'll make a smaller los…

OpenAI's hypergrowth year was 2023, they have steadily been losing market share over the past year while taking record losses.

I don't know where you get that from, but it's pretty easy to prove it wrong: with their daily active users count, OpenAI and Anthropic would have been profitable for years if that…

> This stuff is just obvious to anyone working with the latest models. Fully autonomous agents are a game changer. This kind of takes makes me cringe. Why don't you go back to Link…

> just a very last-gen way of using agents. Fable has only been out for a month but somehow everyone is supposed to have moved to a completely different way of working that suppose…

> but it’s nothing like Fable. It’s still strongly human-in-the-loop which is fine, It's funny to see that Anthopic shills have been saying the exact same thing for the past two ye…

Yes, that requires some amount of intelligence , that's exactly my point.

Not making mistakes my four years old would not. They are definitely smart enough to be useful, but dumb enough in their weak spots not to deserve the " general intelligence" quali…

I think it's Karpathy who coined the term “jagged intelligence”. LLMs are both extraordinary smart in domain they have been explicitly trained on (like Math) and positively dumb on…

Asking questions to clarify user intent is a very low bar for intelligence. A bar that all SOTA models fail consistently at though. (It's both funny and legit infuriating when Opus…

And after half an hour using it he'd just admit that his test was way too simple as these models are still way too dumb

Ads work when you can server $.01 worth of ads to a user for $.0001 of server cost. I fail to see how you can make it work when doing LLM inference which is significantly costlier …