Viewing profile — stultissimus
stultissimus
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Dec 10, 2022, 6:21 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 172
- Public activity
- 10 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About stultissimus
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46817333
PDX is a double edged sword. Human tumors are engrafted into mice with no immune system. Immune-cancer interface is incredibly important, yet completely lacking in these models. Co…
-
comment
Comment #38943775
Reading life science textbooks and substacks is a great way to get started (see [1], [2]). Also, there is a major deficit of software engineering talent in biology research (probab…
-
comment
Comment #38943717
This has actually been done for genetic circuits in E coli (bacteria) by Chris Voight's lab at MIT. Their platform is called Cello [1], and it enables interoperation between Verilo…
-
comment
Comment #38942478
Synthetic biologist here. This is a good answer, but looking at man-made genetic programs can give us a simplified perspective. We've made significant progress engineering programs…
-
comment
Comment #34242681
> If you don't mind me asking, how do you deal with this kind of culture, where a normal process is being purposefully obstructed with such behavior from the reviewer? A huge part …
-
comment
Comment #34240766
In general we can conduct 'directed evolution' (selective breeding is an example). In this example, however, we're talking about improving the resistance of Halderia to the possibl…
-
comment
Comment #34239803
Mutation rate ranges many orders of magnitude. See a figure here (linking a tweet (not mine) to avoid journal paywall, but underlying paper is linked in the tweet): https://twitter…
-
comment
Comment #34239722
> 1. the parent raised questions in a neutral way. these questions seem essential for validating experimental design. why would peer reviewers present such questions in passive-agg…
-
comment
Comment #34238289
Biophysicist here. Excellent questions – these are the kind of points peer reviewers would raise (though typically in far more esoteric and passive aggressive ways...). (1) could b…
- story