Viewing profile — stophecom
stophecom
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Jul 09, 2018, 7:22 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 19
- Public activity
- 25 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About stophecom
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #45119879
I'd recommend the following options. Both platforms offer enterprise solutions, but also provide free starter plans: https://www.storyblok.com/ https://www.datocms.com/ From own ex…
- story
-
comment
Comment #34808418
No, unfortunately not at this point. I got often issues with bigger files in Chrome for some reason. (network error) But Firefox worked. I try to improve the stability in the meanw…
- story
-
comment
Comment #34751119
Was about to say. Domain is great. I created scrt.link some time ago, which does the same thing as well :)
-
story
Show HN: Sharrr – Pretty secure file transfer
End-to-encrypted file transfer.
-
comment
Comment #32576409
Well, fair questions. So as mentioned in the footer. The service is powered by scrt.link, which encrypts the url on the client. That means br3f never knows what link you intend to …
-
comment
Comment #32576213
With br3f you can create disguised and disposable redirect links. Use it whenever you have to share a sensitive URL in a chat or email.
- story
- story
-
comment
Comment #28405500
> If you want to quickly commit something really small and trivial in master/a branch/a PR without having to do the whole stash/checkout/pull/change/commit/push rigmarole (like if …
-
comment
Comment #27800710
Issue is resolved. Using DELETE request now, which feels a bit more accurate. Blocking crawlers is no longer needed, which also benefits page speed! Thanks again for the input. C.
-
comment
Comment #27800693
Thanks again for all the feedback. Short update: I'm using DELETE now, since it feels a bit more accurate. As a side effect, the page is way more responsive. :) Have fun sharing se…
-
comment
Comment #27729337
Yes, this is a joke. Not sure it's a good one to earn trust ;). C.
-
comment
Comment #27712704
Oh wow :) Do you know, by any chance, what type of filter/firewall your institution is using? I'd be interested in the reasoning behind the flagging/blocking. C.
-
comment
Comment #27710852
> email security services do click on links before delivering to the client's email inbox True. This may be a problem. Like mentioned, common bots are being blocked currently, plus…
-
comment
Comment #27709514
The part of the URL holding the encryption key is not sent to the server. https://stackoverflow.com/questions/14462218/is-the-url-frag... Don't take my word for it :) You can check…
-
comment
Comment #27708930
Not exactly. Sure, if your email is compromised someone could access the secret link, and ultimately your password. But now, you will know that someone else had access to your pass…
-
comment
Comment #27708585
Very good point! Thank you. I'll look into this.
-
comment
Comment #27708451
It is done entirely on the client. You can check the source code. Read more on scrt.link/security.
-
comment
Comment #27708435
Thanks for the feedback. Appreciate it. I believe you can earn the necessary trust by being transparent. For this kind of service two things are essential: - Open source software: …
-
comment
Comment #27708390
Thanks for the feedback. Much appreciated - I'll look into the consistence naming issue. > Features like delete after N visits or by X date might be useful too. Indeed this is an o…
-
comment
Comment #27708101
Good question! Bot traffic from common apps/services is beeing blocked. But let me know if you run into a problem. C.
- story
- story