Viewing profile — stop_thief

A counterpoint to this interpretation of the Dowling verdict - http://lawtheories.com/?p=1881 : > This lack of “physical removal,” as required by the statute, meant that Dowling’s …

An interesting history lesson, but irrelevant to the current discussion.

Illogical. Please show your working.

Because you're using an unreasonably narrow definition of theft that doesn't include intangibles.

Ah, that tired old linguistic argument that completely misses the point.

Well it is bad. You're basically a thief, no matter how you try to justify it to yourself. Really, you should be ashamed, rather than nonchalantly unconcerned about your behaviour.…