Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — stianan

stianan

HN member
Joined
Tue, Feb 15, 2011, 11:40 PM UTC
HN karma
102
Public activity
38 items

About stianan

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #6197265

    Nope. Not possible. You are entirely your brain. Nothing more, nothing less. You cannot reasonably claim to know this. Of course, your parent comment cannot know that "no arrangeme…

  2. comment
    Comment #6196914

    It's a theorem that starts off with some assumptions, and gives you some implications. It does not say anything as general as "some things are unknowable in mathematics".

  3. comment
    Comment #6196752

    I appreciate your point, but I think invoking Gödel's incompletness theorems in this context is taking them far out of their scope.

  4. comment
    Comment #5690128

    Is that article written by Mochizuki? Can you make sense of it?

  5. comment
    Comment #4710796

    You're absolutely right. In my native language, the relative key is called the parallel key. Sorry for causing confusion. So, to clarify, I'm not claiming there is a III in the ori…

  6. comment
    Comment #4710741

    Right, the key III is the parallel major. I'm shifting the base of the notation for this passage. When I say III ends the build up, I mean III in the parallel major key, i.e. V(7) …

  7. comment
  8. comment
    Comment #4710708

    Your build up progression is exactly the same as mine, only I interpret it as based on the major key III. I agree we're not talking about modulation in the usual sense, but I think…

  9. comment
    Comment #4710288

    I think I have to a disagree with your analysis. The verse is in a minor key judging by the looping riff. This is interrupted once in a while by a iv-v-i cadence, and then the vers…

  10. comment
    Comment #4709814

    It would be interesting to read the proof that de Jong's function has an attractor. Do you know where I could find it?

  11. comment
    Comment #4709439

    So an attractor is the image of a recursively defined function?

  12. comment
    Comment #4709325

    Could someone explain what an attractor is? I looked it up on Wikipedia, but I don't understand how these shapes benefit from the definition given there.

  13. story
  14. comment
    Comment #4094353

    My impression is that it has to do with the perceived commerciality of the entity doing/facilitating the copying.

  15. comment
    Comment #4059682

    Out of curiosity, are you unlikely to use the code because it's C++ or because it comes from Facebook?

  16. comment
    Comment #3683698

    Perhaps they use some kind of right-to-left fastcall convention. Or maybe they are just unconventional, putting "this" at the end of the parameter list, hence ending up in differen…

  17. comment
    Comment #3683690

    I don't immediately see why it would be putting arbitrary data in front of the vtable unless it's done by a person. Do you have any ideas?

  18. comment
    Comment #3682724

    The inconsistent placement of the "this" argument in function calls seems to support this being C. The vtable moving around would indicate that each class layout is hand-written, t…

  19. comment
    Comment #3628115

    At 28:35 he says: "This is a 100% match with what you see here. The most telling evidence are the missing dots here and here. These are your missing dots". Which dots is he referri…

  20. comment
    Comment #3033138

    I don't understand how warping the extra dimension will make particles appear to move faster. Is it possible that it is everything else that is moving linearly along a fifth dimens…

  21. comment
  22. comment
    Comment #2730081

    I really don't appreciate the argument that "it doesn't matter what the constant is". Of course it doesn't matter if you are only interested in the result of a calculation, but lik…

  23. comment
    Comment #2536592

    I get your point. However, this isn't a fix, it is, according to the article, a volunerability that allows "remote execution of malicious code". People who know WebGL better than I…

  24. comment
    Comment #2536440

    Could this have anything to do with VUPEN's recent Chrome exploit?

  25. comment
    Comment #2482825

    Why bother removing it when it will always be available elsewhere? I honestly don't understand.