Viewing profile — stianan
stianan
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Feb 15, 2011, 11:40 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 102
- Public activity
- 38 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About stianan
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6197265
Nope. Not possible. You are entirely your brain. Nothing more, nothing less. You cannot reasonably claim to know this. Of course, your parent comment cannot know that "no arrangeme…
-
comment
Comment #6196914
It's a theorem that starts off with some assumptions, and gives you some implications. It does not say anything as general as "some things are unknowable in mathematics".
-
comment
Comment #6196752
I appreciate your point, but I think invoking Gödel's incompletness theorems in this context is taking them far out of their scope.
-
comment
Comment #5690128
Is that article written by Mochizuki? Can you make sense of it?
-
comment
Comment #4710796
You're absolutely right. In my native language, the relative key is called the parallel key. Sorry for causing confusion. So, to clarify, I'm not claiming there is a III in the ori…
-
comment
Comment #4710741
Right, the key III is the parallel major. I'm shifting the base of the notation for this passage. When I say III ends the build up, I mean III in the parallel major key, i.e. V(7) …
- comment
-
comment
Comment #4710708
Your build up progression is exactly the same as mine, only I interpret it as based on the major key III. I agree we're not talking about modulation in the usual sense, but I think…
-
comment
Comment #4710288
I think I have to a disagree with your analysis. The verse is in a minor key judging by the looping riff. This is interrupted once in a while by a iv-v-i cadence, and then the vers…
-
comment
Comment #4709814
It would be interesting to read the proof that de Jong's function has an attractor. Do you know where I could find it?
-
comment
Comment #4709439
So an attractor is the image of a recursively defined function?
-
comment
Comment #4709325
Could someone explain what an attractor is? I looked it up on Wikipedia, but I don't understand how these shapes benefit from the definition given there.
- story
-
comment
Comment #4094353
My impression is that it has to do with the perceived commerciality of the entity doing/facilitating the copying.
-
comment
Comment #4059682
Out of curiosity, are you unlikely to use the code because it's C++ or because it comes from Facebook?
-
comment
Comment #3683698
Perhaps they use some kind of right-to-left fastcall convention. Or maybe they are just unconventional, putting "this" at the end of the parameter list, hence ending up in differen…
-
comment
Comment #3683690
I don't immediately see why it would be putting arbitrary data in front of the vtable unless it's done by a person. Do you have any ideas?
-
comment
Comment #3682724
The inconsistent placement of the "this" argument in function calls seems to support this being C. The vtable moving around would indicate that each class layout is hand-written, t…
-
comment
Comment #3628115
At 28:35 he says: "This is a 100% match with what you see here. The most telling evidence are the missing dots here and here. These are your missing dots". Which dots is he referri…
-
comment
Comment #3033138
I don't understand how warping the extra dimension will make particles appear to move faster. Is it possible that it is everything else that is moving linearly along a fifth dimens…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #2730081
I really don't appreciate the argument that "it doesn't matter what the constant is". Of course it doesn't matter if you are only interested in the result of a calculation, but lik…
-
comment
Comment #2536592
I get your point. However, this isn't a fix, it is, according to the article, a volunerability that allows "remote execution of malicious code". People who know WebGL better than I…
-
comment
Comment #2536440
Could this have anything to do with VUPEN's recent Chrome exploit?
-
comment
Comment #2482825
Why bother removing it when it will always be available elsewhere? I honestly don't understand.