Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — stephanfroede

stephanfroede

HN member
Joined
Mon, Jan 26, 2015, 11:18 AM UTC
HN karma
25
Public activity
17 items

About stephanfroede

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #14750814

    The article is not mentioning that QE flooded the capital markets with money globally. Money which mostly sits idle (they are so desperate that they buy bonds with negative interes…

  2. comment
    Comment #12016313

    Job Ad Title: Warp Engineer with at least 5years hands-on needed You should have a solid knowledge of operating Planck length structures. N-Dimensional and Indeterministic Modellin…

  3. comment
    Comment #9320733

    My question? Why Python? The most (if not all) Big Data technologies are all based on the JVM (Java and/or Scala), why not just using JVM based languages, like Java, Scala and Cloj…

  4. comment
    Comment #9077137

    What are "hard distributed database problems"? I came to the conclusion that they do exist, but I have observed a need to manage millions of tiny write transactions per second-> Io…

  5. comment
    Comment #9077104

    Cool approach. I had some fights with Neo4J and taming IO. I did fall back on a 2nd Level Cache, which is nothing else than a huge hash map/KV store in memory.

  6. comment
    Comment #9053368

    Oh, even fission:-) May be we will see shoe box sized fission reactors, if Lockheed succeeds.

  7. comment
    Comment #9053135

    There are some misconceptions in the article (imo): The claim that game is already over is wrong, major car manufacturers like BMW, Audi, Mercedes, GM, Ford, PSA, are working on al…

  8. comment
    Comment #8948760

    Joke: may be you need a quantum singularity to get the intelligent machine singularity... No I do not think that we do have black holes in our brains, and no we are not connected b…

  9. comment
    Comment #8948730

    The conclusion is that you need the quantum "layer" to get a intelligent machine. Not the simulation of quants. Could be much easier than trying to simulate everything. Google trie…

  10. comment
    Comment #8948432

    Dualism is a part of it, but dualism is more an ethical question. Indeterminism is more about emergence, quantum fields and such things. How the universe works. My impression is th…

  11. comment
    Comment #8948225

    A chess board is a closed system with fixed rules, as far as I know you only need a lot of computing power to apply the min-max algorithm to solve any chess game. In a chess game t…

  12. comment
    Comment #8948166

    It was in my best intend to ignore all attempts before the Wright brothers to try to fly. It is the same here, we have the wish to make intelligent machines, but we may lack an eng…

  13. comment
    Comment #8946682

    The difference is the plane did fly without the understanding after little research, but we are trying to make the machines intelligent since decades. Something is missing, imo.

  14. comment
    Comment #8946669

    You touched the core of the discussion, imo, that is there are two schools of thaught involved. One sees the universe and anything else as a machine -> determinism The others are s…

  15. comment
    Comment #8946641

    Where is your argumentation? Ditching together something that is looking like a neural net and boost it with statistical tricks, is just not a brain. If you just define something a…

  16. comment
    Comment #8946480

    So goes the argumentation since 1960.

  17. comment
    Comment #8946476

    The singularity is a linear projection of computing power, in this projection anything that is questioning the singularity is pro-actively ignored. What puzzles me most, is why it …