Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — stavrianos

stavrianos

HN member
Joined
Tue, Mar 17, 2009, 7:51 AM UTC
HN karma
639
Public activity
228 items

About stavrianos

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40681956

    Low trust world, I guess. If I'm poking around to see whether I like something or not, no way am I giving it a real email.

  2. comment
    Comment #40300424

    this is a _very_ false dichotomy

  3. comment
    Comment #36511820

    The problem with facebook isn't that individual users sometimes do bad things on it's platform.

  4. comment
    Comment #36150374

    Compare to trademark genericization, where a brand name becomes the word for a whole product category, and loses trademark protection because our use of the word is more important …

  5. comment
    Comment #36147132

    > This will be easily proven by people moving from Reddit to an alternative. Or disproven by not moving to an alternative. This ignores the nature of network effects. The value of …

  6. comment
    Comment #36146994

    In regards to the idea of reddit rent-seeking - the primary value of reddit is not something they create, it's something they _host_. It could be anywhere, but by dint of network e…

  7. comment
    Comment #36146755

    I was absolutely not using the term in a legal sense. Is "commons" even a legal term? I suppose I should have said "should be a commons" - as in, a publicly generated and maintaine…

  8. comment
    Comment #36146572

    We could fight about the actual value of the CPU, HDD, network, etc is. Not literally zero. The manpower to keep it running is a stronger argument, but I still think it's missing t…

  9. comment
    Comment #35551069

    I keep seeing people talking about chatgpt hallucinating when it's wrong, but not when it's right. Maybe I've misunderstood, but isn't it just always hallucinating? It's not like t…

  10. comment
    Comment #31840298

    I've seen this conversation before, but I've never been clear on what exactly the consequences of the SSO are. I imagined, it might be that the provider gets an IP address when you…

  11. comment
    Comment #31268402

    What precisely are the consequences of the third-party auth? Is it, they get an IP ping each time a device connects or does anything? Or, does that only happen once, but they can r…

  12. comment
    Comment #18417475

    > sperm rates in women remain constant

  13. comment
    Comment #17754769

    > Remember, you're part of the government. This is a really important idea, and I don't think I've seen it expressed so clearly before. Thank you.

  14. comment
    Comment #17620658

    Easy: anyone who isn't specified gets the higher rate.

  15. comment
    Comment #16815597

    Exactly this. Assuming that shadow-profiles are derived on-demand, the only way to "delete" one would be to delete the datapoints it's built from. We know that facebook can use con…

  16. comment
    Comment #15534427

    > The majority of people need a truck a few times a year at most. There's a big grey area around the word "need". The list of things that can be done with a truck, that can't be do…

  17. comment
    Comment #15022369

    From outside, there's no fundamental difference between a good argument and a persuasive one, even though they're ideally orthogonal. If there's an argument that seems good, and yo…

  18. comment
    Comment #14060554

    We don't need it to simulate the universe for a billions of years. We just need it to simulate your belief that it happened for a couple of seconds.

  19. comment
    Comment #13478876

    Bet you I can!

  20. comment
    Comment #12852096

    Doors it follow that everyone wandering into that radius for the same text?

  21. comment
    Comment #11981926

    Ha! Bet they don't. This is exactly how superstitions are made.

  22. comment
    Comment #11793005

    Well, I mean, you have to consume enough power to get a jumbo jet up to cruising speed.

  23. comment
    Comment #11191397

    Alright, but now you trust that person. Which might be fine, but as an exercise in paranoia is not the greatest answer. As a social proof, somewhat better - create the opportunity …

  24. comment
    Comment #11191260

    But, at some point there must be trust. If you don't trust software, you can try to sandbox it, but now you have to trust the sandbox. This devolves very rapidly. Open source at le…

  25. comment
    Comment #10584274

    Systems designed to prevent black swan events need to be evaluated against a higher standard than "there haven't been any since we started". That's not success, it's exactly what w…