Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sriram_malhar

sriram_malhar

HN member
Joined
Tue, Dec 21, 2010, 1:25 AM UTC
HN karma
3,367
Public activity
755 items

About sriram_malhar

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49180561

    If you check "jealousy" (instead of "jealous") on MW, you get this editorial note: Depending on who you ask, jealousy and envy are either exact synonyms, totally different words, o…

  2. comment
    Comment #49179509

    An aged uncle of mine (who loved his wife very much) once said, "I hope she goes before me. I'd never want her to face the pain of my leaving". Such love.

  3. comment
    Comment #49163602

    They may be equivalent in common parlance, but that’s a bit like saying it is ok to use ‘your’ instead of “you’re” just because it is so common. We say “jealously guarded’ not ‘env…

  4. comment
    Comment #49018298

    Is it easier to say 'non-profit' compared to 'not making profits'? But seriously, can someone explain why openai went this route?

  5. comment
    Comment #48881871

    Vint had an interview?!! Who had the gall to suggest he needs to come in and be evaluated?

  6. comment
    Comment #48793268

    "for now"

  7. comment
    Comment #48715462

    Nicely done.

  8. comment
    Comment #48531281

    You still used AI, even if the results weren't correct.

  9. comment
    Comment #48531258

    Not the first result. The AI summary generated by gemini.

  10. comment
    Comment #48528272

    This feels so quaint today. How I'd like to be back in that timeframe.

  11. comment
    Comment #48528240

    Anyone who does a Google search gets a satisfactory looking answer as the very first entry. I daresay most people don't go beyond that, not even the entries on the first page, let …

  12. comment
    Comment #48516958

    What a beautiful explanation. Wow! This is hands down the clearest exposition I have encountered. Kudos.

  13. comment
    Comment #48303529

    The level of corruption is staggering.

  14. comment
    Comment #48274416

    I wasn't aware of this. The first edition came out in 1991. The 4th ed came out in 2012, by which time Perl was no longer the duct tape of the internet. Perl 6 had muddied the wate…

  15. comment
    Comment #48273988

    That’s not true. I wrote the Panther book, Advanced Perl Programming, and easily made way more than 100k. Of the 25-30 or so dollars the books cost, I got 10% per copy, or $2 after…

  16. comment
    Comment #48060369

    Doesn't anyone here have _one_ kind word to say about its features? Every one seems to be starting with "on the other hand".

  17. comment
    Comment #47761898

    Uh, dayumm. I don't know how I got that wrong.

  18. comment
    Comment #47746936

    Many of you might know of Noisebridge, a beloved hackerspace in San Francisco. They had (have?) a juggling workshop every saturday called "Juggling with Judy", taught by Judy Pinel…

  19. comment
    Comment #47688583

    We have to evolve ways -- or bring back ways -- of making our agriculture less petroleum dependent. But short of a shock of this nature, we are not going to do any research in that…

  20. comment
    Comment #47658332

    Oracle and OpenAI centers getting hit, oil shortages forcing the world the move away from fossil fuels ... my cynical ass feels hope.

  21. comment
    Comment #47612795

    You are right to some extent. But there are huge differences between all the wars the US has fought and is currently involved in, and a China-Taiwan war. Taiwan is only a couple of…

  22. comment
    Comment #47596969

    Sure, they will find out it is a good military. No doubt about that. What the US has found out repeatedly but fails to acknowledge is that the opposition proves to be a match. Viet…

  23. comment
    Comment #47435610

    Reminds me of Abraham Wald's survivorship bias. What of the millions of others who like me who want to live in world without AI?

  24. comment
    Comment #47284583

    I didn't know Hesgeth posts on HN.

  25. comment
    Comment #47279453

    Ah! Sorry!