Viewing profile — srinivgp
srinivgp
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Oct 26, 2013, 1:07 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 150
- Public activity
- 46 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About srinivgp
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44323282
Some people certainly can simply enjoy spending time with people not of their assumed cluster of traits. But that's not what's going on with trans women. They aren't doing some sor…
-
comment
Comment #42286406
https://www.amazon.com/Seeing-Like-State-Condition-Paperback... The alternative is to do the thing that doesn't scale, because all the purported ways of scaling are worse than that…
-
comment
Comment #39390403
Um. A hammer that can build 100 houses a second would be incredibly valuable, both solving and causing some very important problems. So good analogy from my perspective I suppose, …
-
comment
Comment #39152016
Salespeople don't want to join an org without performance-based compensation. We can ask why, but that brute fact is enough to explain why sales positions tend to have performance-…
-
comment
Comment #38810635
"people only use about 2% of the volume of their house at any given time"
-
comment
Comment #38199056
Did you not read the last clause? > lastly, it happens to be true
-
comment
Comment #38124011
> which are far less intelligible they seem fine to me maybe you're just used to it, and i'm used to the other it, and mine requires fewer distinct glyphs
-
comment
Comment #37989664
> resent Fine, step one, work on why you'd resent that.
-
comment
Comment #37981122
It contextualized, of course. <= 2019: 4.5-5.5 == 2023: ~5.5 (between: significantly higher, also COVID, probably not a coincidence)
-
comment
Comment #37661155
If you play games you can't play games without missing a ton of really good games. There are _a ton_ of really good games.
-
comment
Comment #36497120
Only if they actually tried to think. Otherwise they don't get automatic passes for believing random things just because I am not 100% guaranteed to end up believing a correct thin…
-
comment
Comment #34823579
In a very real sense, so do you.
-
comment
Comment #34214534
Not easier. More awesome .
-
comment
Comment #33183143
Things going bad is bad. Dying is bad. Etc etc. Sometimes on net things are good because of other effects like "ah, promising new competitor gets a chance to shine!" but if you cou…
-
comment
Comment #33181001
IF a company goes bad, it's great that new companies eat their lunch. It's bad for a company to go bad. It's bad for a company to lock out competition.
-
comment
Comment #33050901
Pretty much every direction is a local improvement given _some_ starting point, but if you broaden your overall search, the "more self-deception" direction is gonna be worse.
-
comment
Comment #32529829
If we prevented all suicides there would be _well more than ample_ precedent of people trying to commit _and being stopped from_ committing suicide and later hating everyone for ke…
-
comment
Comment #32394076
'cause humans beat apes and if you plunked down 20,000 humans onto a world with 10 billion apes, humans would beat apes call it a slippery slope if you want, the fallacy is when yo…
-
comment
Comment #31413056
I had this problem. It crippled me. One or more of the following solved it: - just time plus regression to the mean - talking with a therapist, for a while - being hit with a compl…
-
comment
Comment #29020059
> we’ll need to identify important people with both a high degree of importance but with a low degree of tech literacy, i.e. your average white, male C-level executive From this, y…
-
comment
Comment #28446748
It is not flawed. The subject is under study, continually. The debunking comes from https://www.pnas.org/content/118/4/e2016976118 where yes, many measures of happiness seem to inc…
-
comment
Comment #28342528
There are many potential right reasons. One wrong reason might be "I heard it from a Facebook group founded to spread the word that GMOs were created to make a pliable citizenry".
-
comment
Comment #28165019
The paper you linked to says, in its summary section, "For the general public, evidence shows that physical distancing of more than 1 m is highly effective and that face masks are …
-
comment
Comment #28149047
It's pretty conclusive. It's been conclusive for years and years, before COVID-19. There's no question at all that masks reduce infectiousness through the extremely obvious method …
-
comment
Comment #27456095
It does not. It maximizes log-wealth. Maximizing expected wealth gives a strategy which results in $0 a lot of the time but much much more than Kelly occasionally, achieving a high…