Viewing profile — squid3

NodeChef is a good alternative where you don't have to do the tedious job of managing servers. https://www.nodechef.com/

Maybe all you need is NodeChef. Saves you time and money. https://www.nodechef.com/

Unless I misread the article, but the writer makes a claim of having to support 100 req/sec with about 50 instances. "For Fargate, this meant deploying 50 instances of my container…

NodeChef does not use Dokku under the hood but you can achieve what you want and more with the platform. https://www.nodechef.com/

Another alternative to deploy a Rails and PostgreSQL app is on NodeChef where developers have three simple options to choose from to deploy apps. https://www.nodechef.com/

NodeChef MongoDB hosting is an option worth considering for hosting databases. https://www.nodechef.com/mongodb-hosting

NodeChef Redis Hosting is another option that makes it easy to deploy, operate, and scale Redis in the cloud. https://nodechef.com/redis-hosting

Nodechef provides a lot more for startups and budgets of any size. https://nodechef.com/

You may find NodeChef's object storage the right solution. https://nodechef.com/s3-compatible-object-storage

NodeChef's object storage is very attractive option especially with no data transfer charges. Available in two regions. https://nodechef.com/s3-compatible-object-storage

NodeChef is a Heroku alternative which is cheaper that DIY https://www.nodechef.com/

NodeChef, though not a major cloud provider provides hosted PostgreSQL. https://nodechef.com/docs/postgresql

If you want to look at it from popularity angle, we continue to see many meteor deployments on https://nodechef.com/meteorhosting suggesting it's still a popular choice out there.

NodeChef provides a great platform for developers who don't want to wrangle with the complexities of server-side infrastructure or using multiple services to host an app. By Integr…