Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sprovoost

sprovoost

HN member
Joined
Sat, Sep 11, 2010, 10:48 AM UTC
HN karma
120
Public activity
84 items

About sprovoost

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #35885067

    It already has the "fix" inherited from the Bitcoin code they reuse. Though you shouldn't count on that feature to not have bugs: the Dogecoin codebase is old and poorly maintained…

  2. comment
    Comment #35884968

    This script asks a node for the 2000 headers between block 783,569 and 785,568. It's normal for a node to request headers in chunks of 2000, either as part of syncing the entire ch…

  3. comment
    Comment #31645287

    I think their name is deceptive, see my other reply :-)

  4. comment
    Comment #31645272

    I wouldn't even call them a publisher. They're a printer, drop-shipper and a book store. I am both the writer and the publisher and I hired my own editor. A lot of companies call t…

  5. comment
    Comment #31644972

    Ah, I see your point. Here's a January 6, 2009 snapshot from the Way Back Machine. This was before he publicly released the code. The entire project is MIT licensed and only contai…

  6. comment
    Comment #31597534

    You're confused about the roles here. An editor is someone who works either directly for the author or they work for the publisher. In any case they don't work for the printer / di…

  7. comment
    Comment #31597493

    I did not say: "They will all scan physical books" I said: "It's a matter of time before they all scan the content before printing."

  8. comment
    Comment #31597449

    You take everything literally I assume?

  9. comment
    Comment #31594984

    I guess Hackernews doesn't render the tl&dr I wrote:

  10. comment
    Comment #31594929

    Maybe I was not clear enough on this: I'm not claiming my book was censored, at least not in the traditional political sense of the word. What I'm saying is that the way the book g…

  11. comment
    Comment #31594789

    So you're saying that Amazon will communicate their requirement to a "real" publisher, but not to fake publisher like me? Some sort of old boys network I should just pay to join?

  12. comment
    Comment #31594733

    If Amazon wanted more detailed proof, they could just ask for that. There's no limit to how pedantic one can be in evaluating evidence. Maybe they need a physical wet signature fro…

  13. comment
    Comment #31594666

    Nowhere do I predict Amazon to become a monopoly. The prediction is that all other publishers will start following their model of screening content. Perhaps against some global bla…

  14. comment
    Comment #31594649

    Yes, because Amazon doesn't scan paper books, this route still works. But there aren't that many companies that can print books. It's a matter of time before they all scan the cont…

  15. story
  16. story
  17. story
  18. story
  19. story
  20. story
  21. comment
    Comment #16447453

    I stopped reading at “James Damore, who was sacked after he circulated the misogynist iniquitous 33,000-word memo” as it reveals this journalist has an overt agenda and doesn’t min…

  22. story
  23. story
  24. story
  25. comment
    Comment #3038343

    How would you go about testing the business model of each of these apps? Are you able to test it this week? Idea one sounds most useful to me, if it hasn't been done yet. Given you…