Viewing profile — spritefs
spritefs
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Dec 07, 2022, 5:55 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 202
- Public activity
- 170 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About spritefs
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #34757132
Why Go and not Java? This article just makes me more reluctant to ever use it for anything But if Google wants to ruin their own lang, sure by all means
-
comment
Comment #34757115
It's an IDE Adding tracking to an actual language is unheard of, but can't say I'm surprised Google is trying
-
comment
Comment #34562956
> Is anyone else noticing that for several 5 year blocks (pentad) the world just seems to get markedly worse? It's like no body seems to give a shit about anyone except themselves …
-
comment
Comment #34554888
> Similarly, strength is really just about how much you work out. Some people can get shredded really easily because of genetics. Some people are just naturally more fit than other…
-
comment
Comment #34541554
Quic sounds like it has a lot of performance potential but hasn't hit critical mass yet
-
comment
Comment #34537785
> that while of course various aspects of intelligence can be affected by genetics Yep this is what I was looking for. Given this, the original claim isn't right > Can you demonstr…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34514076
> Aligning society along a hierarchy of "intelligence" is really just aligning it on a hierarchy of access to education, which is just a function of economic class privilege (or ra…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #34513779
> It's all worthless because I don't see any fancy branding in your resume. According to who exactly? Some stupid person somewhere? Why should anyone here care?
-
comment
Comment #34513763
No clue why this is getting downvoted, maybe by people working in said business who are coping over this But really: why don't more people use ublock origin? It makes the web actua…
-
comment
Comment #34485852
> It is why "redditor" exists as an insulting term, but fb/twitter/etc don't have one. Not necessarily just the users, but the mods too. It really is. If someone mentions using red…
-
comment
Comment #34485839
> The investors and the engineers and all the workers at Reddit will become rich, but the people who do the most important work, as outlined by the brief, are the anonymous moderat…
-
comment
Comment #34485763
> So four were appointed by Nixon, who specifically had in mind moving the court to a more conservative stance. Did he? Whether or not that was his intent is unclear
-
comment
Comment #34482103
> Bellman-Ford is optimal for positive edge only. ??? CLRS says it takes negative weight edges (just no negative cycles) and does it in O(VE). I have no idea where you're getting t…
-
comment
Comment #34472977
Weird that some companies have a dedicated role for that. My current gig doesn't talk about agile at all... we still have two week sprints and self directing teams and all of that,…
-
comment
Comment #34472909
I see a lot of people talking about firewalling in this thread... Apple owns the whole IP range 17.X.X.X, so you can just put the below line in /etc/pf.conf to block all talk with …
-
comment
Comment #34469043
> Also: arguments like this (which tend to be extremely persuasive, and often account for a non-trivial amount of arguments) could be easily eliminated with a simple rule. I wasn't…
-
comment
Comment #34468848
Afaik all my tpm does is create outlook events and occasionally come to our standup to bitch about how we aren't doing enough jira
-
comment
Comment #34468421
What did the agile people do?]
-
comment
Comment #34426281
> Actually, "woke" opinions do reflect those of the general population If woke here means thinking that racism is bad, sure. If it means supporting gay marriage or first trimester …
-
comment
Comment #34426176
> They are also often distinguished by their social and cultural roles, such as their expected behavior and appearance. What if a woman doesn't engage in this role? Is she still a …
-
comment
Comment #34426070
> This is scientifically and necessarily (due to the architecture) true. Given we assume Kantian the framework you just outlined > you do not actually possess omniscient knowledge …
-
comment
Comment #34425631
What I don't understand is this assumption that if you force your beliefs on someone else, it'll make them more likely to believe the same things and they won't see what's being do…
-
comment
Comment #34297034
This is something that could very easily be done with a meta search engine or alternative frontend like whoogle (assuming it isn't already implemented, could be)