Viewing profile — spimmy
spimmy
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Nov 19, 2012, 5:47 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 355
- Public activity
- 80 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About spimmy
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44321704
ha! ok, i never thought of it quite like that.
-
comment
Comment #44321684
just made this exact same point myself, lower in this thread. (author here)
-
comment
Comment #44321663
yes! love this. and many great engineers will go back to being "good engineers" as they pick up new skills. rinse and repeat++
-
comment
Comment #44321652
i think it has to start with having engineering managers and directors who are deeply technical themselves. the idea that you can split up this work into "managers do the people st…
-
comment
Comment #44321610
well obviously there's a ton of variance here. but in the type of engineering i'm most familiar with, any sizable amount of production services or surface layer being owned by a si…
-
comment
Comment #44321477
oh wow i missed that, thank you!
-
comment
Comment #44321455
many fair points here <3
-
comment
Comment #44321431
idk, avoiding landmines seems like pretty significant business impact
-
comment
Comment #44321417
because there is, by definition, an extremely limited supply of the "best engineers in the world". if you can afford to pay top-10% salaries, and attract and retain top-10% enginee…
-
comment
Comment #44321383
i'm struggling to see how what you are saying you value is any different from what i am saying i value (author here).
-
comment
Comment #44263177
Word.
-
comment
Comment #44263137
insightful; cosign. (i wrote the piece)
-
comment
Comment #44263111
This is a good insight, but they already have a therapist. :) (I am the author)
-
comment
Comment #41397508
Excited to see this!! Very much on board with this sort of approach to the future -- wide, structured logs, a balance between machines doing the heavy lifting + humans adding inten…
-
comment
Comment #41222321
jesus christ ok
-
comment
Comment #41222309
it's weird that you think it's a sales pitch, when i ended it by pleading for other people to share writeups of their similar solutions. i know they exist, and i know people who ar…
-
comment
Comment #41222299
HUGE +1 to mixing systems observability with product data. this is an oft-missed aspect of observability 2.0 that is increasingly critical. all of the interesting questions in soft…
-
comment
Comment #41222282
they've had nice things in BI land for YEARS. it's very cobbler's children have no shoes that we're still over here in software land doling out little drips of cardinality, guessin…
-
comment
Comment #41222262
i would love to hear how you are doing all the 2.0 stuff i described on datadog. you can't zoom in, zoom out, identify outliers and correlations.. the data doesn't exist! at best, …
-
comment
Comment #41222253
my eyes popped at the "most expensive solution i've seen so far". compared to what?!? we don't like to promise "it's always cheaper", but .. it's always cheaper, lol. with datadog,…
-
comment
Comment #41222245
i just think that metrics are the right tool for the job when the job is summarizing vast quantities of data. not when the job is understanding complex systems. in order to do that…
-
comment
Comment #41222229
i'm not dismissing otel at all! under the hood, actually, everything is an event in otel ;)
-
comment
Comment #41222221
hey, thanks! i would love to hear your feedback on how i could have made this simpler and easier to understand, if you have any. :)
-
comment
Comment #41073274
What's wrong with banning politics at work?
- story