Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — spimmy

spimmy

HN member
Joined
Mon, Nov 19, 2012, 5:47 PM UTC
HN karma
355
Public activity
80 items

About spimmy

CTO/cofounder at honeycomb.io

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #44321704

    ha! ok, i never thought of it quite like that.

  2. comment
    Comment #44321684

    just made this exact same point myself, lower in this thread. (author here)

  3. comment
    Comment #44321663

    yes! love this. and many great engineers will go back to being "good engineers" as they pick up new skills. rinse and repeat++

  4. comment
    Comment #44321652

    i think it has to start with having engineering managers and directors who are deeply technical themselves. the idea that you can split up this work into "managers do the people st…

  5. comment
    Comment #44321610

    well obviously there's a ton of variance here. but in the type of engineering i'm most familiar with, any sizable amount of production services or surface layer being owned by a si…

  6. comment
    Comment #44321477

    oh wow i missed that, thank you!

  7. comment
    Comment #44321455

    many fair points here <3

  8. comment
    Comment #44321431

    idk, avoiding landmines seems like pretty significant business impact

  9. comment
    Comment #44321417

    because there is, by definition, an extremely limited supply of the "best engineers in the world". if you can afford to pay top-10% salaries, and attract and retain top-10% enginee…

  10. comment
    Comment #44321383

    i'm struggling to see how what you are saying you value is any different from what i am saying i value (author here).

  11. comment
  12. comment
    Comment #44263137

    insightful; cosign. (i wrote the piece)

  13. comment
    Comment #44263111

    This is a good insight, but they already have a therapist. :) (I am the author)

  14. comment
    Comment #41397508

    Excited to see this!! Very much on board with this sort of approach to the future -- wide, structured logs, a balance between machines doing the heavy lifting + humans adding inten…

  15. comment
    Comment #41222321

    jesus christ ok

  16. comment
    Comment #41222309

    it's weird that you think it's a sales pitch, when i ended it by pleading for other people to share writeups of their similar solutions. i know they exist, and i know people who ar…

  17. comment
    Comment #41222299

    HUGE +1 to mixing systems observability with product data. this is an oft-missed aspect of observability 2.0 that is increasingly critical. all of the interesting questions in soft…

  18. comment
    Comment #41222282

    they've had nice things in BI land for YEARS. it's very cobbler's children have no shoes that we're still over here in software land doling out little drips of cardinality, guessin…

  19. comment
    Comment #41222262

    i would love to hear how you are doing all the 2.0 stuff i described on datadog. you can't zoom in, zoom out, identify outliers and correlations.. the data doesn't exist! at best, …

  20. comment
    Comment #41222253

    my eyes popped at the "most expensive solution i've seen so far". compared to what?!? we don't like to promise "it's always cheaper", but .. it's always cheaper, lol. with datadog,…

  21. comment
    Comment #41222245

    i just think that metrics are the right tool for the job when the job is summarizing vast quantities of data. not when the job is understanding complex systems. in order to do that…

  22. comment
    Comment #41222229

    i'm not dismissing otel at all! under the hood, actually, everything is an event in otel ;)

  23. comment
    Comment #41222221

    hey, thanks! i would love to hear your feedback on how i could have made this simpler and easier to understand, if you have any. :)

  24. comment
    Comment #41073274

    What's wrong with banning politics at work?

  25. story