Viewing profile — spi
spi
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Apr 25, 2017, 8:54 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 234
- Public activity
- 66 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About spi
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #46257806
Yes exactly, I fear that shortening the training time would skew the results. In the very short term, smaller batch size is typically better just because you need a certain amount …
-
comment
Comment #46244054
Sorry came a bit late to this reply. Interesting, well, nobody says it's a monotonic function :-) in the limit of _very_ large batches you of course are worse off, because you take…
-
comment
Comment #46243998
Sorry I just opened that file now, and browsed through it very quickly, but my eye fell on the excerpt: ``` However, we did not observe any speedup by increasing the batch size fro…
-
comment
Comment #46215873
Mmh not really. As OP shows, speed increases with larger batch size, but only initially, until the GPU has high enough utilization; then speed improvements flatten out (although yo…
-
comment
Comment #46215796
Thanks, very nice to see these results! Certainly using GPUs with more RAM makes things simpler to scale. Gradient accumulation is as easy as adding a counter for number of steps a…
-
comment
Comment #46205589
A separate comment about conclusions about why they are worse than OpenAI GPT2 - which to me feel to be missing the point. One main point is batch size - I'd agree with Gemini here…
-
comment
Comment #46205240
This is a very nice, detailed post! I have a few minor comments though (maybe a few are discussed somewhere, it's a _long_ article and I can't claim 100% coverage :-) ): Calling it…
-
comment
Comment #41943699
Aside from the weirdness of calling "good old" something that was released 17 months ago :-D I mean, deep learning is evolving at crazy rhythm, but you just can't assume a good pap…
-
comment
Comment #41264209
I know nothing about what makes an industry succeed or fail, and also nothing about web tech, but working in the field I can comment on: > tensorflow looks like currently loosing t…
-
comment
Comment #41234311
I know this is HN and here it's not a popular opinion, but maximum security is _not_ always a good idea. Even setting aside the problem of many different actors having to access th…
-
comment
Comment #41108854
Do you have sources for "The MFU can be above 40% and certainly well above the 35 % in the estimate"? Looking at [1], the authors there claim that their improvements were needed to…
-
comment
Comment #40510290
I'm into AI but not into sound, so I might be saying something stupid here, but I think using something like this for very high volume like concerts would be possibly outright impo…
-
comment
Comment #40498650
Yep that also sounded weird to me. I had, IIRC, three of my wisdom teeth removed as a teenager, I was living in Italy back then. I think two of them in a single session. General an…
-
comment
Comment #40084647
Variety matters a lot. If you pay 1000 trained labellers, you get 1000 POVs for a good amount of money, and likely can't even think of 1000 good questions to have them ask. If you …
-
comment
Comment #40051930
If climate change were visible at that scale (tiny resolution between 0 and 40 degrees) we'd be all boiled since a while. Still, you can see signs: the maximum temperature until 19…
-
comment
Comment #40039761
IIRC, GPT-4 would actually be a bit _smaller_ to visualize than GPT3. Details are not public, but from the leaks GPT-4 (at least, some by-now old version of it) was a mixture of ex…
-
comment
Comment #39839052
Nothing to pardon, asking questions is always the right thing to do :-) I also didn't look into the paper in great details, although I'm quite sure I am not fooling myself, but sti…
-
comment
Comment #39837448
The weights are different, because the model is different. As jzbontar below mentions, the crucial point is that the random noise mask is the same. The diffusion models are trained…
-
comment
Comment #39313362
I suppose varying the neural net size wouldn't be the best way of doing that; very small nets can have very "unhuman-like" behaviour. I'm not an expert on reinforcement learning, b…
-
comment
Comment #38836097
Sharing my experience here. My background is in math (Ph.D. and a couple of postdoc years) before switching to practitioner in deep learning. This year I taught a class at universi…
-
comment
Comment #38680381
I guess I should be wiser than contradicting LeCun on a public forum, but his math doesn't really work out. It only works if there is a unique correct answer to any question, in wh…
-
comment
Comment #38432798
(I'm also replying myself concerning the problem itself). Unless I'm getting myself completely wrong, this also seems to be a very unusually simple problem for IMO's standards. I d…
-
comment
Comment #38432696
Good to know it can do that, in the pasted chat above it didn't. To be honest, it surprised me it couldn't, this isn't exactly a very hard guess given the computation results. It d…
-
comment
Comment #38432434
A decent start? It says absolutely nothing about how to solve it, except repeating the question. The part where it tries out the few first numbers is entirely wrong, given that 6 d…
-
comment
Comment #38275350
Well, nuclear power is literally the reason why in this map: https://app.electricitymaps.com/map France is almost constantly green, while Germany, Poland, and most of the US, are j…