Viewing profile — sph87

> AGI is already here I feel like there has been a ton of noise about this, but frankly, no one has actually defined what AGI means. I feel like the goal post is constantly shiftin…

Should have used a Fish; a bottom-feeder. Might call it a funny Flounder for Founders finding Founders, Funders, First-Timers, or Friends.

This is why I've started moving towards embedded. There is something really nice about being back on a chip with <1MB ram and a handful of Mhz. I know it's really just a leftward s…

I love modules. Honestly. I advocate usage simply as a forcing function for upstream. Tooling support is iffy because usage is low. Usage is low because tooling is iffy. All of the…

Modules my guy. The words “modern” and “C++” don’t go together while using headers. Also your most basic implementation requires me to write 200+ LOC and add a dozen headers. Then …

Where I have found Claude most helpful is on problems with very specific knowledge requirements. Like: Why isn’t this working? Here Claude read this like 90 page PDF and tell me wh…

Correct. No one is denying that Elon loves attention. Everyone knows Elon is really an acronym for 'Elon Loves Ostentatious Notice'. Its GNU'd and everything.

Haha you feel like I’m wrong but you just can’t articulate why? I understand bro. Have a good night.

Right, but by upholding that there was no negligence in the alternative case they prevent the conditions in Wrongful Death of a Minor from being met. There is nothing left to argue…

Yes. It applies to all unborn children. The central question presented in these consolidated appeals is whether the Act contains an unwritten exception to that rule for extrauterin…

Here is the text of the law: (I paraphrased the recourse portion) If the death of a minor child is caused by the wrongful act, omission, or negligence of any person, persons, or co…

The court did not rule on that. This specific law only says children. The defense said this case did not apply because these are embryos that had not been born. The court said that…

Moot mean “open to discussion”. We reverse the trial court's dismissal of the plaintiffs' wrongful death claims in both appeals (regarding the born/unborn). Because the plaintiffs'…

From the ruling: The parties to these cases have raised many difficult questions, including ones about the ethical status of extrauterine children, the application of the 14th Amen…

Yeah man, I don’t disagree with any of that. But that is not what the ruling is about. The law, as it is written, only says “children”. This was a law written in the 1800s. It does…

Negative. The court actually upholds the lower courts dismissal of the case. It simply holds that the word “children” in a law written in the 1800s includes the unborn. That is tha…

It was a very narrow ruling regarding civil liability for wrongful death as it applies to the word “children”. Some insurance companies tried to say that these families had no fina…