Viewing profile — speechduh
speechduh
HN member- Joined
- Tue, Feb 24, 2015, 5:52 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 62
- Public activity
- 15 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About speechduh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #10144344
For comparison, google offers competitive fresh-out-of-top-tier NLP Ph.D.s ~150k cash + 50k /yr bonus.
-
comment
Comment #10088741
I saw a great talk about this @ SIAM data mining by Dave Madigan, for http://omop.org/ Basically, they took a TON of demographic research in the health sciences, explored all possi…
-
comment
Comment #10081816
Far field speech recognition is _really_ hard. You can't just throw any random set of mic / speaker into a tube and expect it to work. The echo is almost exclusively mic / speaker,…
-
comment
Comment #10037043
I tend to think computer literacy is the wrong approach. I think the right approach looks like "interfaces that don't require literacy" (one of the reasons why I think human-qualit…
-
comment
Comment #9808045
So, for anyone not aware: Schmidhuber is _obsessed_ with this. He wrote an enormous literature review of deep learning [0] basically because he felt that people weren't crediting i…
-
comment
Comment #9780794
When you have that much information, the chances for spurious conclusions are also endless.
-
comment
Comment #9778953
IVONA is text to speech only.
-
comment
Comment #9716450
state of the art is still very much using WFSTs and DNNHMMs. IBM and Google are still beating baidu.
-
comment
Comment #9661087
Even if the speech-to-text doesn't, the natural language understanding does.
-
comment
Comment #9585168
That particular stuff is actually pretty typical. I have a textbook that shows similar results on Shakespeare using N-grams from years ago.
-
comment
Comment #9552700
I do think it's fair to call it out, though. Articles in second or third tier journals deserve higher levels of scrutiny. I'd rather see this replicated a couple of times before ac…
-
comment
Comment #9400706
As you yourself said, the claim is "qualitatively" different, not "quantitatively" different. If you think about what qualitatively means, I really have no idea what you're trying …
-
comment
Comment #9348130
+1. Brother was (fresh out of college) employee 20 at a company that IPO'd > $1 billion, and he got about $150k out of his options from 3 years of work. You have to get lucky to fi…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #9102273
Uhm, yes, duh. Isn't this common knowledge? How do people think speech recognition systems are trained? What's more upsetting is that this person is so uninformed about speech syst…