Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sonusario

sonusario

HN member
Joined
Wed, Mar 28, 2018, 9:05 PM UTC
HN karma
25
Public activity
65 items

About sonusario

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #47168840

    I wonder if it stems from any of the "AI uprising" stories where humanity is viewed as the cancer to be eradicated.

  2. comment
    Comment #37769631

    Do you still find this true when taking type aliases into account?

  3. comment
    Comment #37001228

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7KtzyZKSuls

  4. comment
    Comment #35878211

    Glad you got responses because I sat there thinking it could mean un-readable from the vantage of different styles.

  5. comment
    Comment #33317756

    Try not to blink challenge?

  6. story
  7. comment
    Comment #23415570

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-neutral_fuel https://static.berkeleyearth.org/memos/fugitive-methane-and-...

  8. comment
    Comment #22835119

    So, is this to say we approach the irreducible best with induction?

  9. comment
    Comment #22834695

    What about "parsimony in explaining the available data" indicates that it is irreducible though?

  10. comment
    Comment #22833577

    How do we know when we have arrived at something that is irreducible?

  11. story
  12. comment
    Comment #20698252

    > I don't like it because it suggests that freedom and security are somehow at odds with each other, which is already an authoritarian framing of the situation, and really just non…

  13. comment
    Comment #20635911

    > It just takes a very, very long time, but there have been dogma updates and clarifications throughout the centuries, and even admissions of being in the wrong. Clarifications, ye…

  14. comment
    Comment #20614095

    The Final nail: You agree with the following claim: The specific observation of water boiling at 125°C in 1 atm falsifies the claim "water only boils at 150°C+ in 1 atm". Since bei…

  15. comment
    Comment #20575374

    More nails for your argument's proverbial coffin... ;) === > Seriously? You are seriously contesting that a defining characteristic of religion is that it makes non-falsifiable cla…

  16. comment
    Comment #20501779

    > There is no contradiction with my own position, and there is no certainty involved, nor is certainty needed. How do you know there is no certainty involved? How do you know certa…

  17. comment
    Comment #20456516

    "Yes, DUH!" he said as though he were certain, contradicting his own position, a position he's not completely sure exists.

  18. comment
    Comment #20407084

    > Like, even if you were justified in being absolutely certain on some claim, I don't see how that is of any use whatsoever for a conversation. Then what was the purpose of your de…

  19. comment
    Comment #20354556

    > Could you give one example of such a claim? It is certain that you can't be certain of the claim "there is no thing anyone could possibly be certain about". You can't be certain …

  20. comment
    Comment #20319066

    > Just to avoid that confusion: "certain" is not the same as "so incredibly sure that it would be world-shattering to discover otherwise", even though the former often is used coll…

  21. comment
    Comment #20275011

    > I won't answer any further questions about whether I am certain about something until you show that there is anything anyone could possibly be certain about. So apparently you ar…

  22. comment
    Comment #20270822

    > Would you say that my claim is... ? And by asking a question, you have no answer for mine? You seem to think that claims aren't true or false if we don't know whether they are tr…

  23. comment
    Comment #20219176

    Anything you've said with > ... reliability is a property of the claim itself ... I have never stated that I thought this. You may have thought my wording implied that, but that ha…

  24. comment
    Comment #20164697

    You > "But there simply is no such thing as "the reliability of the claim" that is distinct from "the reliability of the method used to arrive at the claim...". Also you (in respon…

  25. comment
    Comment #20113761

    > What is "the reliability of the claim itself", if it is not the reliability of the method that is used to estalish that claim? Wut?? If you can't see that "the reliability of the…