Viewing profile — someonelse17

They're not held legally accountable for political views. The copyright stuff applies to everyone already.

It's debatable if the China thing applies, in any case congressional committees need not interfere.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

I'm not talking about Silicon Valley, I'm talking about all other industries in all countries, most Silicon Valley companies are banned in China, stop vilifying Silicon Valley. I'm…

I don't see a unique human rights angel here, there are many companies doing business with China and a number of other "iffy" governments, if congress was truly alarmed by that the…

What you want and what the law allows are different things, also just don't let any entity control how you think. As for 'being held accountable' as publisher, I'm sure you're awar…

I don't know about the prevalence of other opinions but what I'm suggesting (and there are many legal precedents to support this) is that the first amendment shields them from this…

I'm not sure what's behind the recent prevalence to this theory but that is false. Also we should all want section 230 protection it's what preserves free speech online and the pri…

The politics of private citizens are their own business and explicitly not the government's. Furthermore even if that had any bearing on their search results whatever google presen…

Convening a hearing on a specific subject (silly as it as in this case) then making it an open season for all other grievances is another despicable aspect of these hearings.

[flagged]

Define "getting cozy" in this context and please explain why a public hearing is in any way better than a private one or even just exchanging correspondence.

If it was truly about policy they would have accepted the lawyer, it's theatrics and grandstanding and campaigning from that dais.

I don't think it was warranted in that case either, it was an exicise in public humiliation, a bunch of people who never created anything getting off on talking down to someone muc…

Unless it's illegal it's none of their business.

Google offered their top lawyer for the senate hearing but they rejected him, I guessing it's because they needed CEOs in order to maximize the pleasure from their exercise in publ…

I also would like to have my cake and eat it.

Leak what? It says so in the permission screen when a user chooses to grant access.

Why? does Jeff Session not like the weed reference? There is no call for a criminal probe her.