Viewing profile — snugghash
snugghash
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jul 04, 2015, 6:07 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 19
- Public activity
- 24 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About snugghash
[ my public key: https://keybase.io/snugghash; my proof: https://keybase.io/snugghash/sigs/Eld4INWHHOvyvEKL7CA01ZIZp2uNPGl1eilbG-GgNQY ]
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #29053676
Seems like a rare backpedal by Apple, which I'm happy with. Also happy with them doing more for right-to-repair. It's very unbecoming of a 2T company to punish suppliers for leakin…
-
comment
Comment #29053647
I'd like to modify that to be even more long-term - progress is where they know everything about you and can assist in everyone's best interest. The individual is not necessarily t…
-
comment
Comment #29053630
Why exactly? Information is good - if you were a single organism you'd want as much information at your disposal as possible. Indeed that's why we wear fitness trackers, we don't t…
-
comment
Comment #29053582
You mistake the way western governments are structured with "governance of a society". The CCP is far more than the traditional there branches of the western democratic government.…
-
comment
Comment #29052062
I'm not in the field. For anyone else curious about relationship to things like TLA+ ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TLA%2B ) - the discussion at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?…
-
comment
Comment #29052003
Thank you for the thoughtful expansion. I completely agree with you on the level you're thinking about this, and I also agree that our tech level in collaboration is basically ampl…
-
comment
Comment #29051923
Yes, but prioritization is everywhere - maybe the EU finds that their ideals and principles were an instance of the XY problem, and privacy doesn't matter at all. I'm not saying th…
-
comment
Comment #29051872
My metric here is "grabby success" or growth. I alluded to this in my comment but essentially, if you have a society, civilization, entity, species, w.e., it's almost guaranteed to…
-
comment
Comment #29051728
Seems like the CCP was "right" all along. All of our governments are simply playing catch-up at this point. Unless the western-influenced can prove their superiority with growth an…
-
comment
Comment #29051412
Our tooling for communicating ideas and finding good ones is equivalent to mob rule, same as a hundred years ago, just amplified. More at my older comment https://news.ycombinator.…
-
comment
Comment #29051341
You're missing an important point here, that Eric Weinstein brings up a lot. The goal of science is finding truth, but the mechanism of how it happens right now is very tied to the…
-
comment
Comment #29051301
That's better as "the effects of my pretend actions are very real" than anything more subtle
-
comment
Comment #29051178
The core problem here is that our technology for discourse is basically twitter and "voting with likes". The algorithms are optimized for attention and likes, so the mob wins - not…
-
comment
Comment #29051125
I think it's a fairly well-understood causal inference problem to figure out how much effort (money) needs to be spent on other people for GDP growth from that one person to offset…
-
comment
Comment #29046650
I just noticed that my jaw dropped for the first time in recent memory. Wow. Slow clap. UK, US, China... just wow
-
comment
Comment #29046582
tbh, probably exactly how the current uni works, with vacuum energy and virtual photons communicating things in QED. Somethings probably randomly fail, but because entropy and time…
-
comment
Comment #29046458
What? The core aspect of FB/Twitter/etc. is twofold 1. No guaranteed-attention obligation from your circle, so you're free to share more things 2. Algorithms for YOUR attention so …
-
comment
Comment #29046430
You do realize there's an edit button? It's next to the timestamp etc., the comment metadata
-
comment
Comment #29046358
I think you're forgetting an important stakeholder here: humanity. We as a unit need to do things in an efficient way so we can save our limited resources for other, more important…
-
comment
Comment #29046265
I think it's pretty daft to not consider an investment (by all of humanity, which I get is hard) which can improve efficiency by a lot, for all of time until we direct BMI. At some…
-
comment
Comment #29046235
Is Otter.ai's tech any better?
-
comment
Comment #16604224
I'd argue this is barely worth the time spent. You'd use at least a hundred services of this sort, with a flux of at least one a week. 2-3 hours reading up on intricacies, setting …
-
comment
Comment #16604186
I think that's because the service is hosting the data, not the data itself. Holding onto the data which you (expect to) own is pretty much akin to a person taking care of a pet fo…
-
comment
Comment #15457841
For open source commercial, it's the same as for-profit. They'll probably get a discount. For open source non-profit, it'd still be NC and therefore legal?