Viewing profile — snarkinatree
snarkinatree
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 02, 2012, 12:31 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 39
- Public activity
- 19 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About snarkinatree
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #3922653
And how do you propose to decrypt those packets?
-
comment
Comment #3922588
I agree tapping into the existing userbase is enticing. And that's no doubt what some people are trying to do (e.g. the Russians). But all VOIP codecs are not created equal. Skype'…
-
comment
Comment #3921714
Yup. This is why it's amusing to watch trademark registrants going after domain names based on confusing variations of their registered mark. Meanwhile their trademarks are being h…
-
comment
Comment #3921535
It's great they support it, but how many people have DNSCurve enabled authoritative nameservers? And how many OpenDNS cache users are routing their queries through a DNSCurve forwa…
-
comment
Comment #3921487
I wouldn't take part in this for "credentials". I would do it for the sake of learning. Some of that acquired knowledge might be applied for commercial gain, some might not. Does i…
-
comment
Comment #3920742
This is also how OpenDNS makes money. Neustar does the same. And probably others too. They call this "DNS service". Anyone can run a resolver, including your next door neighbor. Un…
-
comment
Comment #3920686
How about "Skype: The Missing Technical Manual"? MS will contribute nothing to the state of the art of free voice and video calls over the internet. As is so often the case, what t…
-
comment
Comment #3917974
Normal people care about price. As in free calls. All three criteria you mention are very easy to meet. Skype's GUI was thrown together quickly in Delphi. Yet it's good enough for …
-
comment
Comment #3917581
I'm definitely not a FOSS zealot. However I might be a zealot for simplicity, lucidity, keeping code small, unclever and boring, making compilation quick and easy, not tolerating m…
-
comment
Comment #3917522
My "title"?
-
comment
Comment #3917511
Is that really true, or just an assumption? How can we be sure that doing stuff like this was a contributing cause, let alone a necessary cause?
-
comment
Comment #3917443
Can you provide an example search that demonstrates this? If Wikipedia had full-text search, with a results page that looked like Google, and it was as fast as Google, would you us…
- comment
-
comment
Comment #3917189
Try not to think in terms of server and client being separate machines. Or thinking that a server needs to be complex or able to handle an unlimited number of nodes. It's possible …
-
comment
Comment #3917163
What did I link to? I'm well aware of the Apple "rules" as well as the rationale behind them. If you have superiror knowledge about Apple that puts them in a better light, then ple…
-
comment
Comment #3917118
Nothing wrong with what Skype did. He made his money. Good for him. The point is that Skype is not magic. It's something that can be replicated, with simplicity and transparency. I…
-
comment
Comment #3917070
The need to have Wikipedia in search engine results is perplexing. Why not just search Wikiepdia? It is certainly not slower. They even provide SSL. Is it the lack of full text sea…
-
comment
Comment #3917053
What's remarkable is that Apple is suppopsedly desintined to be the most profitable company in US history and they still feel the need to do this kind of thing. It says a lot about…
-
comment
Comment #3917024
Please share the snarky replies!