Viewing profile — snapcaster

Mind sharing which company you use for this?

I already have a rich social life outside the office

Yes of course

No it's because we're social animals that are supposed to be around other people. Sick of covid granting so much legitimacy to the antisocial among us. I actually think everyone sh…

Their comment was thoughtful and at least added to conversation. Your comment is just "LLMs don't really have neurons" which is obvious to literally every user of this site includi…

Why this gaslighting? obviously the massive companies with vested interest in monetizing your attention and data

It didn't require saying, and you're also wrong. They don't have physical neurons like a brain but they are made up of abstractions we all agree to call neurons

okay sure, but also put the fucking graph at the top come on

Good Editors are Invisible would make more sense. I think this only applies to the class of tools we would call "controllers"

at no point are you justifying why this would be FUN. it's like you don't even understand what a game is supposed to be

how would it impact the fun of the game if they weren't?

Obviously you're right, but none of this stuff matters to the dudes who worship him. As long as he keeps making the people they hate angry they'll support him, even at their own ex…

games are about fun, if something only adds realism for no reason it's not good game design to add it

you're really reaching for no apparent reason. Just move on from pattern matching machines it's not a good mental model for LLMs

by "we" you mean an extremely small group of people who read lesswrong. Everyone else was immediately wanting to do it

I blame black mirror for this attitude. If you're going to speculate on imaginary futures why can't they be positive?

I hate this crab in a bucket framing. It's so anti-working person. Why isn't it that wages are insanely deflated compared to the US?

Nobody owes you a scientifically rigorous write up

So it's a sci-fi short story? what reason would anyone have to believe this stuff?

I meant this idea that you can quickly iterate on laws. At least in america that's just unrealistic outside of very narrow instances

what's your point here considering you were wrong? in the last 16 years they've been one of the most profitable companies in the history of the earth

you're not engaging with all the political and game theory issues that make that difficult to do in practice. Let alone the uncertainty that impacts businesses (even ones that are …

You're not modeling this adversarially and that's your fundamental error here. If you look at your "knowledge supplier" as an entity actively trying to deceive you and give you an …

You're not modeling this adversarially and that's your fundamental error here. If you look at your "knowledge supplier" as an entity actively trying to deceive you and give you an …

"knowledge is good" is such a naive take. Trivial example: You only have knowledge of crimes committed by immigrants but zero knowledge of crimes committed by citizens. How is that…