Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — smoppi

smoppi

HN member
Joined
Wed, Aug 25, 2021, 12:25 PM UTC
HN karma
404
Public activity
39 items

About smoppi

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #48429841

    There is no such thing as an "AI". It's just a marketing term for so-called neural networks (that supposedly emulate a brain) running large language models. They don't have intelli…

  2. comment
    Comment #43415627

    It's now been about five years since I heard about the Rust programming language for the first time. It was when I was starting to write an operating system in C and the "Rust peop…

  3. story
  4. comment
    Comment #43264745

    More than a year ago I wrote a document that I named "UEFI fact sheet". The purpose was to create a more truthful counterpart to a similarly named document which the UEFI forum was…

  5. story
  6. comment
    Comment #39852180

    ST-DOS is a DOS implementation, but it is not meant to be a clone of MS-DOS. It is mostly syscall-compatible with MS-DOS, but the driver API and many other things are completely di…

  7. comment
    Comment #36829074

    >I was there too. People always say this, but just because a thing changed once does not mean it will happen again. The problem is that the web standards have now grown so much tha…

  8. comment
    Comment #35243043

    The text was too long, so I had to put it in pastebin.

  9. story
  10. comment
    Comment #32837026

    > Non-corporate-supported browsers might transition to being more friendly to this process instead of the unhelpful and scary SSL warnings provided now. That's exactly what I would…

  11. comment
    Comment #32836962

    When I'm talking about "lookalike domains", I mean domain names that look exactly the same. It is simply not possible with 7-bit ASCII. A self-signed certificate can also be used t…

  12. comment
    Comment #32836781

    Clearly it is not suggesting anything like that. You misunderstood it on purpose.

  13. comment
    Comment #32836762

    I am living in reality. I don't want to limit the user's freedom. Sometimes people have to learn the hard way, but the other option (giving away your freedoms) is always worse.

  14. comment
    Comment #32822717

    1: You can always use a stronger encryption. You don't have to use decades-old encryption that has already been compromised. 2: So clearly in this case the route wasn't trusted. Th…

  15. story
  16. comment
    Comment #29979458

    After the OOM handler had halted everything the 10:th time, I finally decided to do something (at least the kernel and the TCP/IP stack seem to be very stable, because it still did…

  17. comment
    Comment #29966630

    A hello world for an IBM PC compatible does not require much. Sadly UEFI has made everything exponentially more complex. If you want to be more minimalistic, this also works with i…

  18. comment
    Comment #29963442

    I recorded that video from a computer that is connected to the same ethernet hub as the 486 server.

  19. comment
    Comment #29963429

    Yes. I wrote a special mouse driver that hooks to the keyboard interrupt and makes it possible to use the numpad keys as a "mouse". Sadly most DOS programs seem to replace the BIOS…

  20. comment
    Comment #29963410

    It consumes about 30 watts.

  21. comment
    Comment #29961306

    Considering that it has to be able to handle about 100 new sockets per second, one socket requires about 1 kB ... 2048 kB (?) of memory depending of the size of the buffers and how…

  22. comment
    Comment #29961128

    This video answers to your question: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0CeK1TnGhIs

  23. comment
    Comment #29961097

    Everything in my "operating system" is 16-bit x86 code. It uses regular DOS packet drivers. I have also started writing my own DOS kernel, but it is not ready yet. The server uses …

  24. comment
    Comment #29960823

    Yeah, a 486 is not a slow CPU - not even the 25 MHz SX version that the server has. But Windows 95 is a 32-bit protected mode OS. My OS also works on a 8088, but I don't have a 808…

  25. comment
    Comment #29960571

    I think the user will most probably keep pressing the F5/Refresh button anyway if the site is not working at the first try, so responding with a RST packet would just use more band…