Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — smokedetector1

smokedetector1

HN member
Joined
Fri, Apr 19, 2024, 4:03 PM UTC
HN karma
303
Public activity
168 items

About smokedetector1

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49215773

    If you don’t understand the difference between existing in proximity and being disruptive then you are inconsiderate

  2. comment
    Comment #49215718

    Why is that rude? Youre just expressing yourself. Im responsible for my reaction. Right?

  3. comment
    Comment #49215588

    is there anything, in your view, which would make someones behavior objectively rude?

  4. comment
    Comment #49214590

    Kissing != making noise. Maybe you need to consider paying more attention to how your actions affect others in public spaces

  5. comment
    Comment #49213995

    I could be clearer. I’m saying that the fact that OP even noticed and was annoyed by it is evidence that facetime man is at fault, unless OP identifies as someone with a population…

  6. comment
    Comment #49213907

    People should err on the side of minimizing disruption in quiet public spaces.

  7. comment
    Comment #49213810

    The blog says they were talking louder than everyone else in the room. Inconsiderate people always think others should just chill out

  8. comment
    Comment #49213691

    If you act like an inconsiderate asshole 50% of the time, then you’re an inconsiderate asshole, even if you follow basic social politeness the other 50% of the time. Seems like an …

  9. comment
    Comment #49197918

    In fact, a lot of wealth is only created by inequality. If wealth is power to effect your will, you have more of it when others are more desperate. The Shanghai wealthy have to spe…

  10. comment
    Comment #49009410

    I don’t automatically hate someone because someone calls them despicable

  11. comment
    Comment #48992968

    Why does it matter to you so much that OC is unambiguous?

  12. comment
    Comment #48992583

    Genuine question: are you on the spectrum? I find this reaction strange

  13. comment
    Comment #48984700

    this is really hard. nice!

  14. comment
    Comment #48984046

    Why does this shorthand upset you?

  15. comment
    Comment #48980205

    Would you prefer OC was more specific, ie “the author turned out to be a racist”, or do you have an issue with calling someone like this despicable?

  16. comment
    Comment #48942450

    Identical treatment of all people in all situations for all laws does not exist and should not exist. Children have different labor restrictions than adults. Police have different …

  17. comment
    Comment #48934415

    I believe NYC cops should be able to have guns. I dont want guns to be widely accessible in NYC. I’m comfortable with armed security at an airport. I’m less comfortable at a superm…

  18. comment
    Comment #48930303

    you genuinely dont see a difference between (1) a single or handful of security-angled cameras controlled by a local business for security purposes (2) any individual possibly reco…

  19. comment
    Comment #48905675

    During my first role at , I believe I accidentally made an enemy of a couple of directors due to ill-timed interpersonal awkwardness and unwillingness to suck up. What can I say - …

  20. comment
    Comment #48899729

    Its pretty clearly AI written but human curated (hopefully). To me it didnt read like unadulterated slop

  21. comment
    Comment #48898047

    High quality, charming article. The Hikaru defeat mentions made me chuckle. One possibility I think you’ve omitted is that they slopped the puzzles pretty hard

  22. comment
    Comment #48887770

    The fallacy is that f(t+N) can be obtained by iterating f(t+1) N times. This is the “step”

  23. comment
    Comment #48731017

    You don’t consider supporting “remigration”, aka forced expulsion of non-white-skinned people, to be actively malicious? What if he was physically going door to door and assaulting…

  24. comment
  25. comment
    Comment #48684624

    this argument assumes that capex and training costs will go down over time. but theyll have to keep up with one another and stay on top of latest knowledge so Im not sure if thats …