Viewing profile — smf
smf
HN member- Joined
- Fri, Feb 17, 2012, 3:44 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 54
- Public activity
- 9 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About smf
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #30231808
Please see my comment below: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30227886 and the subsequent threads below. Not all blocklist providers are the same.
-
comment
Comment #30231067
> The screenshot I got of your conversation with (Dave) was, indeed very well done and was both informative and actionable. You responded to us very quickly and with a high level o…
-
comment
Comment #30229079
> Bottom line: our duty of safeguarding customer data trumps this weeks fashionable spam heuristics. I haven't suggested that you do anything differently to that. Keep the data, ke…
-
comment
Comment #30228990
From our perspective, we don't link IP and domains at all at the moment, they are totally independent. Because spam traps get very different traffic to a real mail server, you can …
-
comment
Comment #30228916
Sure - happy to elaborate here, re-reading my response I understand the confusion here as my choice language wasn't great ;-) I didn't say anywhere that you MUST support HTTP unsub…
-
comment
Comment #30228779
Traps = Spam Traps. One of the ways most blocklists work is by employing spam traps which can either be individual email addresses or entire domains. It's quite a large topic, but …
-
comment
Comment #30228354
Apologies for not being clearer on this, I'm generally talking about marketing messages when I say "not keeping in touch". My point here is "consent to send", e.g. I think most peo…
-
comment
Comment #30227886
I'm the Abusix engineer in question (and actually the architect of the system in question), and you're being somewhat "economical" with what actually happened here. Here's the actu…
-
comment
Comment #6846649
Exactly. Well said.