Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — smcq

smcq

HN member
Joined
Mon, Oct 12, 2009, 1:24 AM UTC
HN karma
72
Public activity
54 items

About smcq

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #1167833

    That particular visualization wouldn't show an average global temperature increase until after the artic was quite dry. As the author says, a picture is a story. His story is "at a…

  2. comment
    Comment #1163850

    Were you alive in the 90s? I'm just wondering out loud.

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #1160250

    In this post, we see the strange assumption that large corporations inherently make more efficient bureaucrats than elected officials.

  5. comment
    Comment #1145297

    You can't handle the truth.

  6. comment
    Comment #1134511

    Look, I'm not going to argue with you because you have no idea what you're talking about. Go away.

  7. comment
    Comment #1133795

    Do the same thing you would do in SQL, run the efficient query (you're almost guaranteed have a view for date limited for a specific customer) then filter it based on product. This…

  8. comment
    Comment #1133784

    You don't seem to understand how stored views work. This computation cost is felt at insertion time and is not theoretically worse than the exact same computation cost at insertion…

  9. comment
    Comment #1112884

    You know, I was going to point out how amazingly brain dead that comparison was, and how inappropriate it was to try to guess my skill level in various languages based on my claim …

  10. comment
    Comment #1100872

    I've had this before, it works pretty well to say "do not contact me again" and go on with your life as if it never happened.

  11. comment
    Comment #1099798

    Yea, I'm 100% ready for touch screens to become a reality so I can start playing with more complicated keyboards. The idea of physical keys (even with a better layout like Dvorak) …

  12. comment
    Comment #1098831

    I easily program software 50x faster in python than C. If I didn't, I would be using C for speed.

  13. comment
  14. comment
  15. comment
    Comment #1098506

    They promote offline caching, so I'm betting speediness was because his edits were modifying a local db then going through diff resolution after they displayed.

  16. comment
    Comment #1098500

    Every single day when we don't program in COBOL. I'm at a bit of a loss, have you never switched to a more productive language and cringed when you went back to the old language?

  17. comment
    Comment #1097484

    You're effectively arguing that all languages/frameworks are equal within an order of magnitude. I think this has been demonstrated false time and time again, and you even demonstr…

  18. comment
  19. comment
    Comment #1097348

    This language looks pretty awesome, reading the example code I can see how it would slash my loc for ajaxy stuff by at least an order of magnitude. However, I am confused about thi…

  20. comment
    Comment #1097330

    Programming languages aren't that hard, so I'd say, if it makes them way more productive later, then no it's not a waste of time.

  21. comment
    Comment #1097242

    Exactly what compensation do you think entry level employees should be getting? Exactly what should the be making 10 years later after you've (nearly) doubled their salary.

  22. comment
    Comment #1096349

    Yea, but it's right pinky which is weaker for most people. By moving it you also gain the -_ being on the home row (which you type less than semi-colon while programming in syntax …

  23. comment
  24. comment
    Comment #1096006

    Copyright is not patent. Patents expire inside our lifetimes. H.264 will be a viable product for startups to use in 2017. (As an aside, don't cast this as a FF vs. the world, paten…

  25. comment
    Comment #1094973

    As a dvorak programmer, it just prompted me to write more python. If you're typing {} characters all day, you should consider how much semantic value that's adding to your programs…