Viewing profile — smartaz42
smartaz42
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Oct 17, 2021, 3:20 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 23
- Public activity
- 13 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About smartaz42
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #44513549
I've always thought it odd that the one thing the caller and callee need to agree on are called arguments.
-
comment
Comment #44472104
While walking my dog on leash some years back, we were surrounded and stalked by 5 very hungry coyotes (it was a drought year and they were very scrawny) for about 20 minutes. They…
-
comment
Comment #44422383
FWIW for C only I've used libtcc repo.or.cz/w/tinycc.git with great success. The API is a joy, as we all expect from a Bellard project. It focuses on compilation speed, the generat…
-
comment
Comment #44370649
For me, one of the enjoyable aspects of toy projects is that there is no schedule to meet. Which means that I can take my time. And yes, that means I take much more time than the a…
-
comment
Comment #44284559
I haven't personally used it but cosmopolitan claims to provide a simple and portable sandboxing capability
-
comment
Comment #44224824
I've found Jason Ricci to be a most useful source as well. Adam Gussow, Tom Leckie, Will Wilde, and Howard Levy all have recommended YouTube content. I haven't checked out the app,…
-
comment
Comment #43747224
Hmm, but speculation is so easy and sampling is anything but. Some of Einstein's speculations were pretty damn productive. The later experiments aka samplings (Einstein proved righ…
-
comment
Comment #42552688
What would "south" even mean to flat earther? I can't envision a model in which any sane definition wouldn't lead to a contradiction.
-
comment
Comment #34142638
I'm sure that they have outstanding customer support. But you, however, are not the customer.
-
comment
Comment #33377336
Redbean (part of the often discussed comopolitan c library) does something like that.
-
comment
Comment #31182879
Wouldn't that be SFH?
-
comment
Comment #30422877
That grammar simply matches 2^(n-1) a's. Not mind-boggling from that point of view
-
comment
Comment #28893653
Hmm, isn't square normally x*x?