Viewing profile — smalltalk
smalltalk
HN member- Joined
- Sat, Jan 01, 2011, 5:53 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 198
- Public activity
- 75 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About smalltalk
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #6385673
So does InDesign, which uses the TeX algorithm, QuarkXPress, and just about any other application that lays out text. Even Word! Think of that! A program far more suited to laying …
-
comment
Comment #6376219
Does having Lyme disease make one an insufferable pretentiously pompous ass?
-
comment
Comment #6367598
No, if he knew anything at all about legal expenses, he wouldn't have implied it made sense to sue someone with maybe $500,000 in assets.
-
comment
Comment #6338210
What does this post have to do with the topic? Why do we care what you've read over the past year? No one cares and you're not that special. Other people read too.
-
comment
Comment #6311934
What people seem regularly to forget is that if you are not a US citizen, you have absolutely no right or privilege to enter the US. While the US may decide to extend you the court…
-
comment
Comment #6311857
It may be all three factors, but given (C), (C) alone is reasonable justification for his situation, rendering (A) and (B) irrelevant.
-
comment
Comment #6303453
Really? You can get into the UK without a passport from Syria these days?
-
comment
Comment #6299357
You're not an American leaving the US, so your comment is irrelevant. And if the graduate school opportunity was at UMass, I assure you, it was not a very good department.
-
comment
Comment #6281517
Care to explain why it's shoddy journalism?
-
comment
Comment #6272153
With respect to contract enforceability, writing is helpful for evidentiary purposes, but outside of a few specific areas governed by the statute of frauds, not required at all - a…
-
comment
Comment #6272100
Try not paying for any of those things and see how it goes.
-
comment
Comment #6267601
Judicial person is also correct. Also correct are fictitious person, artificial person or juristic person. In other words, no need for the "correction."
-
comment
Comment #6224638
For those who understand English, the title should be: "Man turns 60, commits suicide and leaves a website as suicide note." Come on, let's try to get those nouns and verbs to agre…
-
comment
Comment #6181583
Refunds for anyone? I can't believe this guy asks for a donation to his legal defense fund. I already donated when I paid for a service that I now can't use. How do I go about gett…
-
comment
Comment #6181575
I already donated when I paid for a service that I now can't use. How do I go about getting a reverse donation -- i.e., a refund?
-
comment
Comment #6100448
When and why would a lawyer be concerned with web-specific typography? I can't possibly imagine a lawyer ever needing to know about web-safe fonts or any other aspects of typograph…
-
comment
Comment #6072506
Saying "clearly" is usually a sign that you're trying to avoid explaining why something is true. Could you explain why PRISM violates the original spirit of the 4th amendment? The …
-
comment
Comment #6053450
Let me guess, you're a soviet?
-
comment
Comment #6033560
If you believe this is what happened, you need a much better understanding of the financial crisis. I suggest you try reading anything written by anyone, which would be certain to …
-
comment
Comment #6006854
What does "traitor on par with the [C]old [W]ar" mean? Do you know what "on par" means?
-
comment
Comment #6006846
Really, you think the average American thinks more highly of his country than the average Frenchman? Have you ever spoken to a Frenchman?
-
comment
Comment #6006843
What's a reasonable alternative? Anarchy? The "state" -- most rational people would say "government" -- you discuss is a collection of municipal, state and federal government, with…
-
comment
Comment #6002068
Please, leave the US.
-
comment
Comment #6000754
This is absolutely, without any doubt, the stupidest, least intelligent and most ridiculous and sensationalist comment ever to appear on the internet, or to be expressed in any oth…
-
comment
Comment #5996076
Let's try to remember that Roberts is appointing individuals from the existing set of federal judges -- i.e., people who have already been appointed by the President of the United …