Viewing profile — smac__
smac__
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 10, 2022, 9:13 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 39
- Public activity
- 20 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About smac__
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
- comment
-
comment
Comment #44694097
https://www.manning.com/books/css-in-depth is an excellent option. This book helped fill in the gaps for me when it comes to modern CSS.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #43763191
Might be helpful to expand on what you mean specifically by the worst parts in your view and how Ruby's decisions provide better trade offs.
-
comment
Comment #43583591
> Corporate media does a fantastic job of ignoring and minimizing protests they're not in favor of Honest question: What incentives do Corporate media have to ignore these current …
-
comment
Comment #43299787
Two exceptions could be: - url hash links and the css :target pseudo class. - Links that target iframes Not suggesting to use these patterns liberally, but they do work for light i…
-
comment
Comment #43254025
The USA was part of the Budapest Memorandum. This is a pretty strong reason for the USA to provide support for Ukraine. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum
-
comment
Comment #38190262
The ice cores are fairly reliable: https://www.bas.ac.uk/data/our-data/publication/ice-cores-an...
-
comment
Comment #38112123
Focusing on the multiple goals and limits seems like a much better way to measure the health of economies (or large systems). Is there any country that uses this model, or a simila…
-
comment
Comment #35728095
You are definitely right, I missed quite a few numbers in this set. (Thank you!)
-
comment
Comment #35727714
Again, excellent point! These numbers clearly show why* my reasoning is missing a rather large portion of this set. [edit] - fixed typo
-
comment
Comment #35727606
Good point, the depth first search algorithm is a bit lack luster for this case: 1 -> .1 2 -> .01 3 -> .001 4 -> .0001 5 -> .00001 6 -> .000001 . -> .0∞1 I would definitely recomme…
-
comment
Comment #35727524
> I would suggest discussing your approach and your doubts with a mathematician Great point, this is my attempt to do that. Truly, it may be an inefficient means, but it seemed lik…
-
comment
Comment #35727469
Excellent point! Thank you for showing the glaring flaw more to explore.
-
comment
Comment #35726945
Each time I hear the argument, that real numbers between zero to one are a "larger" (nuanced) infinity than natural numbers, I want explore and see if it is possible to make a one …
- story
-
comment
Comment #35627148
In this case the optimistic UI might be good to have a step like “this request is pending”. So when the form is submitted the data is ready to send and will send when it can. Ideal…
-
comment
Comment #35154769
Here, only apply Don't Repeat Yourself to data not code. Making it mean each piece of knowledge should have a single authoritative reference. E.G. Avoid (if possible) places where …
-
comment
Comment #33157591
Glad to share, he does great work and is easy to work with. I am not sure about the payroll taxes.
-
comment
Comment #33156499
Chris from https://www.seguintax.com/ does an excellent job. Have been working with him (for tax purposes) for quite some time. His office is in NC as well.