Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — smac__

smac__

HN member
Joined
Mon, Oct 10, 2022, 9:13 PM UTC
HN karma
39
Public activity
20 items

About smac__

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
  2. comment
    Comment #44694097

    https://www.manning.com/books/css-in-depth is an excellent option. This book helped fill in the gaps for me when it comes to modern CSS.

  3. comment
  4. comment
    Comment #43763191

    Might be helpful to expand on what you mean specifically by the worst parts in your view and how Ruby's decisions provide better trade offs.

  5. comment
    Comment #43583591

    > Corporate media does a fantastic job of ignoring and minimizing protests they're not in favor of Honest question: What incentives do Corporate media have to ignore these current …

  6. comment
    Comment #43299787

    Two exceptions could be: - url hash links and the css :target pseudo class. - Links that target iframes Not suggesting to use these patterns liberally, but they do work for light i…

  7. comment
    Comment #43254025

    The USA was part of the Budapest Memorandum. This is a pretty strong reason for the USA to provide support for Ukraine. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Budapest_Memorandum

  8. comment
    Comment #38190262

    The ice cores are fairly reliable: https://www.bas.ac.uk/data/our-data/publication/ice-cores-an...

  9. comment
    Comment #38112123

    Focusing on the multiple goals and limits seems like a much better way to measure the health of economies (or large systems). Is there any country that uses this model, or a simila…

  10. comment
    Comment #35728095

    You are definitely right, I missed quite a few numbers in this set. (Thank you!)

  11. comment
    Comment #35727714

    Again, excellent point! These numbers clearly show why* my reasoning is missing a rather large portion of this set. [edit] - fixed typo

  12. comment
    Comment #35727606

    Good point, the depth first search algorithm is a bit lack luster for this case: 1 -> .1 2 -> .01 3 -> .001 4 -> .0001 5 -> .00001 6 -> .000001 . -> .0∞1 I would definitely recomme…

  13. comment
    Comment #35727524

    > I would suggest discussing your approach and your doubts with a mathematician Great point, this is my attempt to do that. Truly, it may be an inefficient means, but it seemed lik…

  14. comment
    Comment #35727469

    Excellent point! Thank you for showing the glaring flaw more to explore.

  15. comment
    Comment #35726945

    Each time I hear the argument, that real numbers between zero to one are a "larger" (nuanced) infinity than natural numbers, I want explore and see if it is possible to make a one …

  16. story
  17. comment
    Comment #35627148

    In this case the optimistic UI might be good to have a step like “this request is pending”. So when the form is submitted the data is ready to send and will send when it can. Ideal…

  18. comment
    Comment #35154769

    Here, only apply Don't Repeat Yourself to data not code. Making it mean each piece of knowledge should have a single authoritative reference. E.G. Avoid (if possible) places where …

  19. comment
    Comment #33157591

    Glad to share, he does great work and is easy to work with. I am not sure about the payroll taxes.

  20. comment
    Comment #33156499

    Chris from https://www.seguintax.com/ does an excellent job. Have been working with him (for tax purposes) for quite some time. His office is in NC as well.