Viewing profile — slooonz
slooonz
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Apr 30, 2018, 6:50 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 415
- Public activity
- 134 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About slooonz
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #47864424
One of the hardest problem in programming is naming your variables correctly. I love chaining because it reduce the number of occurrences of that problem.
-
comment
Comment #47585673
"What Elon Musk think or at least pretend to think" is indeed an useful/interesting piece of information, and I don’t see why a commentary on it is necessary or particularly useful…
-
story
Show HN: Uback 0.7 – A universal bridge between backup sources and destinations
Throughout my career, the "who handles backups" job (in a "we have our data on our own servers, not in the cloud" context) has always ended up on my plate. One of the most painful …
-
comment
Comment #47000884
versitygw is the simplest "just expose some S3-compatible API on top of some local folder"
-
comment
Comment #46485770
Why would I pick this over established players : Maddy, Mox, Stalwart ?
-
comment
Comment #46345227
You’re just doing brute force, but with extra steps. It turns out that partial collisions are more common than you think, and it’s not particularly hard to find some. Here, a 186-b…
-
comment
Comment #46072096
Yes it should, because hopefully errors are logged and reported and can be acted upon. Missing name doesn’t.
-
comment
Comment #46061097
It was goofy and fun-looking when the first blog did it. Now that everyone and its dog does those "goofy" illustrations, I find them insufferable.
-
comment
Comment #46044785
I think you should clearly spell out how the key is derived. From the description, I believe it's random string hard-coded in the executable + user-provided password => AES key ? A…
-
comment
Comment #44281567
Operational concerns trumps raw performances most of the time. Stored procedures live in a different CI/CD environment, with a different testing framework (if there’s even one), on…
-
comment
Comment #44272558
That was my first thought, an aimless dialogue is going to go toward content-free idle chat. Like humans talking about weather.
-
comment
Comment #44272540
They failed hard with Claude 4 IMO. I just can't have any feedback other than "What a fascinating insight" followed by a reformulation (and, to be generous, an exploration) of what…
-
comment
Comment #44272091
Mostly males. I’m French and "Claude can be female" is a almost a TIL thing (wikipedia says ~5% of Claudes are women in 2022 — and apparently this 5% is counting Claudia).
-
comment
Comment #43894182
> A priority was to make setup and trial easy for non-technical users That’s a very strange priority. Why would non-technical users would be interested in a file format and a Pytho…
-
comment
Comment #43743230
Yes. This is partly why this article is crap. k*G is never defined, and is the core operation in ECC (also: the article insist on using an elliptic curve in R, but you need to do i…
-
comment
Comment #43313737
Remember that input tokens are quadratic with the length of the conversation, since you re-upload the n previous messages to get the (n+1)-nth message. When Claude completes a task…
-
comment
Comment #43313688
2200 lines. Half of them unit tests I would probably have been too lazy to write myself even for a "more real" project. Yes, I consider $20 cheap for that, considering: 1. It’s a l…
-
comment
Comment #43308534
I decided to try seriously the Sonnet 3.7. I started with a simple prompt on claude.ai ("Do you know claude code ? Can you do a simple implementation for me ?"). After minimal twea…
-
comment
Comment #42908272
Ironically, you exemplify the standard of discourse that the rationalist spaces of discussion like lesswrong strives to go above, which is what makes them so valuable. Loaded quest…
-
comment
Comment #42899511
> I don't think most rationalists would consider themselves leftist Yes they do. https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf5FqX6XBJlfOShMd3U...
-
comment
Comment #42899415
You average grad student in physics is less wrong than Newton in physics (he knows about special relativity for example). It’s not "smugness", of course building on the shoulders o…
-
comment
Comment #42899374
You know that what you are describing is the central observation of rationalism right ? "Humans rationalize, so you better be skeptical of your own beliefs". You presenting it as a…
-
comment
Comment #42798192
> One possibility is that AGI remains a tool, without a mind or direction other than what we give it "Solve for the equilibrium" is the name of the game. "AGI remain a tool" is nic…
-
comment
Comment #42792991
"There is no good answer to that" is precisely my concern.
-
comment
Comment #42778733
> Why aren't there autonomous vehicles already? There’s a lot of reasons. Not in the order of importance, just what in the order of what comes first in my mind : 1. While Real Worl…