Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — skinner_

skinner_

HN member
Joined
Sun, Jun 14, 2015, 9:00 PM UTC
HN karma
180
Public activity
113 items

About skinner_

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #49135281

    No, that's not what this is. This is a warning to the LLM that coming back with partial results is not good enough. Take a grad student with a perfectly good understanding of what …

  2. comment
    Comment #48985914

    Okay, I'm not sure about the original one, but here is the prompt of a successful reproduction: https://aaronlou.com/jacobian_counterexample_prompt.pdf Obviously it is not random, …

  3. comment
    Comment #48984709

    > The prompt for the Jacobian conjecture was obviously not random. the search space is too big to just try all the combinations of 3 variable polynomials. Maybe the prompt containe…

  4. comment
    Comment #48359374

    > You can skirt around not reasoning in research math because so much of it is just extremely tedious symbolic manipulation. LOL

  5. comment
    Comment #48357874

    > You just know nothing about math and are happy to parrot bullshit AI salesmen are selling you. Not the parent poster here. I do know things about math. I wrote a few papers relat…

  6. comment
    Comment #47836548

    My use case is wildly different from CSS, HTML etc. I use numerical algorithms to solve problems in pure mathematics. AI models are now better than me and my colleagues at writing …

  7. comment
    Comment #47240323

    Also, if Claude had regurgitated a known solution, it would have come up with it in the first exploration round, not the 31st, as it actually did.

  8. comment
    Comment #47148533

    I think the nuanced take on Joel's rant is this: it was good advice for 26 years. It became slightly less good advice a few months ago. This is a good time to warn overenthuastic p…

  9. comment
  10. comment
    Comment #46547879

    Then I think you’ll like our project which aims to find the missing link between transformers and swarm simulations: https://github.com/danielvarga/transformer-as-swarm Basically a…

  11. comment
    Comment #46295102

    https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/in-search-of-ai-psychosis is very relevant, but the main reason I’m posting it here is that, unlike this paper, it takes the opportunity to build t…

  12. comment
    Comment #45914763

    I interpreted it loosely, as "be aware of the possibility, and stop looking at it at the first signs of issues".

  13. comment
    Comment #45873183

    100% frontpage-worthy! Frankly I was already bored with all those pelicans, and a bit worried that the labs are overfitting on pelicans specifically. This test clearly demonstrates…

  14. comment
    Comment #45699045

    That's very cool, but it's not an apples to apples comparison. The reasoning model learned how to do long multiplication. (Either from the internet, or from generated examples of l…

  15. comment
    Comment #45698272

    If being probabilistic prevented learning deterministic functions, transformers couldn’t learn addition either. But they can, so that can't be the reason.

  16. comment
    Comment #45520711

    > But which contributes more, they ask? Who gives a shit, really? Funding agencies? Should they prioritize established researchers or newcomers? Should they support many smaller gr…

  17. comment
    Comment #43724094

    My uninformed and perhaps overly charitable interpretation: he warned them they were going to be steamrolled, they built their product anyway, and now OpenAI is buying them because…

  18. comment
    Comment #43349397

    Amazing! I looked into your ADAM claim, and it checks out. Thanks! Now I'm curious. I you have the time, could you please follow up with the 'etc...'?

  19. comment
    Comment #43092723

    You dismiss parent's example test because it's in the training data. I assume you also dismiss the Sally-Ann test, for the same reason. Could you please suggest a brand new test no…

  20. comment
    Comment #42876384

    When you build a new model, there is a spectrum of how you use the old model: 1. taking the weights, 2. training on the logits, 3. training on model output, 4. training from scratc…

  21. comment
    Comment #42813321

    Normally it would answer with a number and an explanation. This one just asks it to skip the explanation so that string comparison can be used to evaluate it.

  22. comment
    Comment #42779570

    In your opinion, why did they choose the open source way instead of doing it in a military bunker? (Metaphorical not literal bunker.)

  23. comment
    Comment #42525061

    Greater totality of experiences than having read the whole internet? Obviously they are very different kind of experiences, but a greater totality? I'm not so sure. Here is what we…

  24. comment
    Comment #42491320

    Sure, these are standard problems, I’ve said so myself. My point is that my productivity is multiplied by ChatGPT, even if it can only solve standard problems. This is because, alt…

  25. comment
    Comment #42490209

    I work on very complex problems. Some of my solutions have small, standard substeps that now I can reliably outsource to ChatGPT. Here are a few just from last week: - write cvxpy …