Viewing profile — skh
skh
HN member- Joined
- Sun, Aug 12, 2018, 6:34 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 1,572
- Public activity
- 435 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About skh
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #19256330
It might be more valuable for blacks to focus on ways to lower the actual crime rate than the perceived crime rate. Oh definitely this is needed. Poor city black culture has some v…
-
comment
Comment #19256288
I didn’t make any implicit ad hominems. From my perspective you read what I write and interpret it with an assumption that I’ve got a particular agenda. Here are some pertinent quo…
-
comment
Comment #19255619
Thank you for your comment. Why does this attire evoke the image of a stereotypical example of a criminal? Where does this stereotype come from? Is the stereotype correct? Does it …
-
comment
Comment #19255389
weberc2 said that the cited paper/study/opinion piece was puzzling given one recent event. I suggested that weberc2 might want to further study the issue to see if his/her percepti…
-
comment
Comment #19255232
In general I agree with the sentiment of your comments. I’m not one to dismiss a person’s opinion posted on an internet discussion site due to lack of cited studies. No one can pro…
-
comment
Comment #19255083
I mentioned that whites are a majority of the population. I wrote: This despite the fact that whites - due to being a majority of th population - consume a majority of the welfare.…
-
comment
Comment #19254888
You can cite anecdotes and the person you responded to cited a study. The puzzling thing is that you choose to focus on the former and not the latter. You have been presented evide…
-
comment
Comment #19254791
I think you read what I wrote with some wrong assumptions. For instance you seem to think that my comment on blacks and crimes was a statement that supports a view of the legal sys…
-
comment
Comment #19254519
In the U.S. we have a lot of problems that are really socio-economic that are discussed in terms of race. There are historical reasons for this and this is particularly true in the…
-
comment
Comment #19252364
We’re always 10 years from total annihilation and destruction. I know people talk in hyperbole to make a point but can you point to any credible source in the last 30 years stating…
-
comment
Comment #19251603
I think you have it wrong. The language was deliberately changed due to work done by Frank Lutz. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Luntz#Global_warming
-
comment
Comment #19251595
Frank Lutz is a big reason for why we went from talking about Global Warming to Climate Change. Frank Lutz is a famous Republcan operative. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frank_Lu…
-
comment
Comment #19249262
But then he doesn't get to passive-aggressively whine about all of his piles of money that the government won't take from him. Suppose you are right that he is being passive agress…
-
comment
Comment #19246276
Your position is consistent but for most people not tenable. It’s hard to claim that the “information” as you put it is abstract when it exists in video format that can be watched.…
-
comment
Comment #19246167
Well, society decides. Sometimes societies have a framework for deciding the grey area between individual rights and the right of society to regulate (in the form of government). T…
-
comment
Comment #19246070
You think child porn is pretty much the only thing that is illegal to video? I think you should do further research on this issue. There’s a lot more than just child porn that is i…
-
comment
Comment #19235121
Do you apply this standard to all beliefs you have? It’s interesting that you wrote what you did when you could have done a search and found some answers. From the third link below…
-
comment
Comment #19233585
I never suggested, hinted, or implied that peoples’ non-expert intuition is always wrong. I never suggested, or implied that people keep their brains shut and feelings suppressed i…
-
comment
Comment #19233557
How do you eplain all the instances of when government has shown regard for doing the best for its citizens? Do you apply the same logic you used here for government on corporation…
-
comment
Comment #19213108
I’ve only been talking about topics in which the overwhelming majority of experts in that area agree upon. If each year’s class of residency graduates in psychiatry all have differ…
-
comment
Comment #19212873
In an area as concrete and black/white as mathematics it’s still hard to convince some non experts that we really do know what we are talking about. Imagine how much harder it is i…
-
comment
Comment #19212452
My area of expertise is mathematics. A number of times I’ve explained to someone that the concept of infinite sets is a well defined one. There is a definition and it allows us to …
-
comment
Comment #19212119
I should have said speech instead of ideas. I think it’s clear from what I wrote what I was getting at. All societies regulate speech. I don’t know anyone who thinks speech should …
-
comment
Comment #19212105
We don’t allow people selling certain homeopathic remedies to make certain medical claims while selling the product. So we do regulate speech.
-
comment
Comment #19211898
Of course people are free to practice medicine on themselves. They are free to make up their own minds on what they think is right/wrong. They ought not be free, in my opinion, to …