Viewing profile — skew
skew
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Mar 29, 2010, 8:53 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 97
- Public activity
- 52 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About skew
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #27595237
It's smaller, but not actually negligible. An old but oft-cited 2002 study said a laptop with a three year lifecycle took about twice the energy to manufacture as operate. Silicon …
-
comment
Comment #16473938
Interesting that you mention neutrino astronomy - if you mean imaging, I don't know of anything but gravity that could focus neutrinos.
-
comment
Comment #13493056
You haven't got many fun answers yet? Here are a few nice programs http://incredible.pm/ http://fluffynukeit.com/software/fnistash/ http://hledger.org/ If you're looking for not-ne…
-
comment
Comment #13352444
Dare I hope "arguments against anthropomorphic global climate change" was not a typo? If not, please share!
-
comment
Comment #12541242
Do you mean "seL4 is great"? I agree it won't do much for application-level security without adding some formally verified code on top (perhaps as simple as setting up isolation be…
-
comment
Comment #10719400
Why do you think D-wave machines can be clustered at all? Unless you say it's operation is not essentially quantum, that would mean demonstrating coherence between a bunch of machi…
-
comment
Comment #10548332
I disagree extensively - raw data should definitely be available, and there are a number of interesting things you can do with it without any special expertise. For one, evaluating…
-
comment
Comment #10545384
I'm sceptical that you've ever actually tried to get any data. The first sentence of NASA's GISTEMP page tells you where they get there data, and a few more clicks will get you to …
-
comment
Comment #10038454
http://www.caltech.edu/news/caltech-announces-discovery-fund...
-
comment
Comment #8272646
The response to the client is only sent after a majority of followers have the log entry. That's described in the text in the "Protocol Overview", and nicely animated in "Log Repli…
-
comment
Comment #7973967
Non-Turing-complete is not a bad way to go. You pretty much have to already be a researcher in dependent type systems (or maybe set theory) to invent functions that always terminat…
-
comment
Comment #7648832
That sounds like a pretty reasonable density to see savings in threaded forth code like the second post talks about (it also mentions adjusting the shift for other densities). Seco…
-
comment
Comment #7196806
Wasn't that precisely the first complaint - observing a pair of incidents which make no sense as a consistent policy? (the second complaint being that even a senator had trouble cl…
-
comment
Comment #5901143
Regarding those particular operators, + is conventionally reserved for commutative operations (e.g, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plus_and_minus_signs#Plus_sign ).
-
comment
Comment #5525913
"kinetic energy" means nothing alone, thrust and specific impulse are better metrics to look at. Doing a lot better than ion thrusters at either without being too much worse in the…
-
comment
Comment #4617166
That's actually the only place ML^F ever requires type annotations - when you want to take a polymorphic function as argument and use it at different types. MLF is basically as str…
-
comment
Comment #4616725
There are some nice examples of re-using the same code at successively more interesting types in Conor McBride's ICFP keynote: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XGyJ519RY6Y (video onl…
-
comment
Comment #4141340
The previous article really didn't make the argument "all you need is static typing". It was specifically refuting the idea that "all you need is unit testing" - or at least that u…
-
comment
Comment #4141300
The first half is a bit easier - if you can show some implementation meets the specification it is at least consistent. The second isn't so clear, but sometimes you can get a bit m…
-
comment
Comment #3951539
Yes, foldr/build is almost exactly reducibles, but not foldables. Iterators do nothing for parallelism either.
-
comment
Comment #3946774
Isn't foldr/build fusion much closer? A collection is represented by a "build" function that takes the reducer, and list transformers become reducer transformers. The main differen…
-
comment
Comment #3931540
The cost model can be very simple. Take the cost model of Java and apply it to programs where all fields are final. Maybe costs are higher than you'd like, but it's simple to under…
-
comment
Comment #3880426
That's incoherent. If you accept the claims of > People regularly say they translated their system from language A to language B and got 10-100 times code-size reductions. then it'…
-
comment
Comment #3861300
Every language is based on a huge mass of things which might fall under "fully understanding the tool you're using". Do you have a sharper distinction separating type inference alg…
-
comment
Comment #3829474
If you were really pedantic, you'd make a distinction between executing beta-reductions directly, and executing them in zero time. Here's hardware that does the first http://www.cs…