Viewing profile — skeptic_69
skeptic_69
HN member- Joined
- Mon, Oct 15, 2018, 5:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 70
- Public activity
- 30 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About skeptic_69
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #18462876
2-parts. features a ton of interviews with high level executives including the facebook "head of growth" and alex stamos who was the security chief. I thought stamos came out of th…
-
comment
Comment #18460709
I think the green-washing comment is definitely on-point. co-opt the opposition and there is no opposition.
-
comment
Comment #18460694
everything old is new again
-
comment
Comment #18454868
Facebook helped me get laid in highschool. Hi jacqueline! That is at least one positive thing..
-
comment
Comment #18454851
I agree.
-
comment
Comment #18454835
Are you referring to master switch or attention merchants? been meaning to read both.
-
comment
Comment #18454803
I don't know if THIS article was directed by Facebook related PR but the times reporting says there is other PR basically identical to this. So I think we can decisively label your…
-
comment
Comment #18454785
:/ yeah.
-
comment
Comment #18454778
not just jaron lanier! there are multiple thinkers who are fellow travelrs. Cal newport, Tristan harris, Nicholas Carr...
-
comment
Comment #18454760
LOL. indeed.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #18454410
how would hear about this story unless you are personally friends with alex stamos or zuckerberg or sandenberg? I am all for skepticism but blanket rejection of responsible journal…
-
comment
Comment #18454179
yep.
-
comment
Comment #18454170
I rendered my disapproval of Facebook by deleting it. That is the only action they care about.
-
comment
Comment #18445619
too little too late but better than nothing.
-
comment
Comment #18437253
1.mmmmmmmmm ok I am willing to accept you meant the quadratic loss instead of 0-1 error. that seems reasonable. 2. this is paper is centered in a research thrust that IS focused on…
-
comment
Comment #18437115
have you heard of something called ERM? uniform convergence? The typical way of showing generalization in ML is to show that if we have some low or zero error solution on the test …
-
comment
Comment #18436828
1. people overfit the baby datasets to zero training loss (MNIST) all the time. maybe you meant a "hard" dataset. 2. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about. This paper…
-
comment
Comment #18305961
> Well, maybe because it's all done by a priest-caste cartel, shielded from reality in ivory towers, and then presented to the public in a similar way religion once was forced on p…
-
comment
Comment #18305934
do you put your work in the arxiv?
-
comment
Comment #18279357
There is a serious and well documented basis in neutral american and european media-going back decades. It reminds me of how so many smart people make decisions based on an anecdot…
-
comment
Comment #18269049
I don't understand why you would publish this in nature instead of FOCs/STOC
-
comment
Comment #18268739
there is a basis to at least some of these claims. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adnan_Khashoggi
-
comment
Comment #18233503
Seals do a lot of direct action. Someone more qualified should explain how much direct action they do. I think a lot.
-
comment
Comment #18233489
i think become a seal/green beret is pretty challenging !