Viewing profile — skavi
skavi
HN member- Joined
- Tue, May 09, 2017, 10:19 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 2,078
- Public activity
- 814 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About skavi
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #49265245
I'd assume Mojo does more complex transformations at the MLIR level than Rust does at its MIR level.
-
comment
Comment #49250768
I wonder if there's any way to get this to plan out a dag of tool calls? i.e. use the results from earlier calls as the parameters to later ones? I tried introducing a stack based …
-
comment
Comment #49173958
can you support those claims?
-
comment
Comment #49173942
why does involvement with EA imply being ethically challenged? i’m personally not involved, but on its face it seems better than not doing any kind of charitable work.
-
comment
Comment #49152831
https://www.pangram.com/history/125358dc-9f80-4fe2-8540-85a9...
-
comment
Comment #49106116
an unprompted LLM would not incorrectly add spaces on either side of their em dashes.
-
comment
Comment #49087818
> The real trick is to do demand-driven compilation starting from the actual final program's needs this is not so far off from hint-mostly-unused, no?
-
comment
Comment #49016084
Wow this is a really excellent and comprehensive overview. Just to calibrate my own intuition, would anyone who was mostly unfamiliar with these concepts be able to weigh in on how…
-
comment
Comment #48579895
it would suck if Chinese tech advanced medical care faster or made it cheaper.
-
comment
Comment #48493146
On the earliest web archive snapshot I can find [0], I do not see any mention of the safeguard/sabotage under discussion [1]. And to be clear, this isn't the safeguard where the mo…
-
comment
Comment #48372349
This is discussed in the post.
-
comment
Comment #48164089
see Windows Subsystem for Linux and Windows Subsystem for Android.
-
comment
Comment #48030485
https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48029540
-
comment
Comment #47914625
(2017)
-
comment
Comment #47912968
i assume it does not have the same goals wrt hermeticity as nix?
-
comment
Comment #47907914
where does this fit in with make, just, nix (devshell, devenv, ...), direnv, etc.
-
comment
Comment #47727397
i’ll take 3. we can be boring together
-
comment
Comment #47717825
doesn’t really feel like that much tbh
-
comment
Comment #47621006
to preempt a discussion emerging based on the title alone, here’s their summary: > While nuclear fusion power is often hailed as a future source of abundant, clean energy, current …
-
comment
Comment #47619298
this may have been what you were referring to with “ buggy GNOME extensions”, but in case it wasn’t: https://tailscale.com/docs/features/client/linux-systray
-
comment
Comment #47512850
Their suggestion is also zero runtime cost.
-
comment
Comment #47507913
wonder whether this will impact their funny little functional language.
-
comment
Comment #47506674
what was the security situation of whatever is now being protected by the IOMMU before it was enabled by default?
-
comment
Comment #47411285
also: 1. tcmalloc is actually the only allocator I tested which was not using thread local caches. even glibc malloc has tcache. 2. async executors typically shouldn’t have tasks j…
-
comment
Comment #47407491
on the OS scheduler side, i'd imagine there's some stickiness that keeps tasks from jumping wildly between cores. like i'd expect migration to be modelled as a non zero cost. compl…