Viewing profile — sjwright
sjwright
HN member- Joined
- Wed, May 26, 2010, 3:48 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 8,739
- Public activity
- 3,481 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sjwright
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #26895864
The original iPad was a first generation product; its status as a minimum viable product was only clear after subsequent product cycles.
-
comment
Comment #26889738
I suspect that new iMac design has been in the can for years, waiting for the technology to catch up. And it’s a consumer device anyway; the real test will be whether the “M1X” ser…
-
comment
Comment #26889554
The original iPad was, in terms of compute specifications, a minimum viable product. The M1 Macs are not—they are the combination of a mature platform with a mature silicon chip. G…
-
comment
Comment #26887354
Wherever possible, they've done exactly that—so how is that a criticism? Case in point is the end-to-end encryption of iMessage. Or the at-rest encryption of iOS devices. In other …
-
comment
Comment #26884215
> Even more cynically, you can say it's private from their competitors. I've heard this from a few people recently, but I don't understand the implied criticism. What should Apple …
-
comment
Comment #26884149
Replaceable batteries were superseded by batteries of sufficient capacity for 99% of users. (And for the remaining 1% I'm sure the non-Apple marketplace has fantastic, no-compromis…
-
comment
Comment #26883921
This is true. Our hearing is well tuned for utility in a pre-modern context. They just don't have anything remotely like the precision of our eyesight, which can judge things like …
-
comment
Comment #26883306
I am not confusing the two. In a band-limited signal, the Shannon-Nyquist theorem mathematically proves that the sampling rate is the frequency resolution. It also proves that when…
-
comment
Comment #26883277
For me bedsheets are their own wash cycle, so there’s nothing to stack them with. I just carry them upstairs and dump them into the blanket box when they're done. No need for a bas…
-
comment
Comment #26875661
> 128k MP3s Twenty years ago, such files would have been barely listenable. Ten years ago, this would have been tolerable but obviously compromised. Today, with the best encoders, …
-
comment
Comment #26875624
The crucial difference is that compared to our other senses, our ears are really, really, astonishingly shit. They can be highly precise in one context and ludicrously imprecise in…
-
comment
Comment #26875566
And more stress on the speaker/tweeter drivers. Of course, when you look at these high resolution recordings, the amplitude of material above 20kHz is piddling. The amount of harmo…
-
comment
Comment #26875501
I believe you are sincere. But I think that if you were able to run a sufficiently rigorous blind test (note: precise level matching is critical ) you'd surprise yourself.
-
comment
Comment #26875469
> It definitely sounded different, I heard things in songs that I've listened to for years that I've not heard before. That usually means one of two things— 1. the frequency respon…
-
comment
Comment #26871007
Again yes, that’s exactly my point. They are double dipping on the good will; first as an employee perk, second on their corporate annual reports.
-
comment
Comment #26869750
I never understood the need to fold bed sheets. Crinkled sheets simply aren’t a problem I’ve ever had; you barely notice the difference once they’re stretched over the bed and pill…
-
comment
Comment #26850343
That’s my point. The donation is financially a corporate donation, but is being marketed to the employee as a perk of their employment. That it’s “their” donation.
-
comment
Comment #26848706
And then the accountants probably tabulated them as corporate donations. So were they gifts from the employee or not?
-
comment
Comment #26841253
Not every website requires retention of every person in order to survive. In my case, my website is better because my user base is tolerant of a bit of jank. I consider it a win wh…
-
comment
Comment #26840928
Exactly this. I have no desire to develop against the most bleeding edge target. Thanks for explaining this better than I could.
-
comment
Comment #26840898
It's no matter; I'm not here for the points. Personally I find it hilarious to be down-voted for stating plain facts about my own (demonstrably effective) development process.
-
comment
Comment #26840882
You do realise that my “about” is a joke, right? Regardless, I’m self-employed and my website makes enough money that I can spend plenty of time arguing with people on the Internet…
-
comment
Comment #26839894
HTTPS is necessary. QUIC is not. It’s going to be a long time before any site requires QUIC in order to work.
-
comment
Comment #26818575
I just don’t like the idea of having my own devices conspire against me to compromise my own privacy.
-
comment
Comment #26818548
As a web developer I don’t test in Chrome—I develop against Firefox and sanity check using Safari iOS. Therefore my site is explicitly optimised for Firefox. Chrome users might exp…