Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sjwright

sjwright

HN member
Joined
Wed, May 26, 2010, 3:48 PM UTC
HN karma
8,739
Public activity
3,481 items

About sjwright

Some say I argue on the internet too much, but those people are wrong.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #26895864

    The original iPad was a first generation product; its status as a minimum viable product was only clear after subsequent product cycles.

  2. comment
    Comment #26889738

    I suspect that new iMac design has been in the can for years, waiting for the technology to catch up. And it’s a consumer device anyway; the real test will be whether the “M1X” ser…

  3. comment
    Comment #26889554

    The original iPad was, in terms of compute specifications, a minimum viable product. The M1 Macs are not—they are the combination of a mature platform with a mature silicon chip. G…

  4. comment
    Comment #26887354

    Wherever possible, they've done exactly that—so how is that a criticism? Case in point is the end-to-end encryption of iMessage. Or the at-rest encryption of iOS devices. In other …

  5. comment
    Comment #26884215

    > Even more cynically, you can say it's private from their competitors. I've heard this from a few people recently, but I don't understand the implied criticism. What should Apple …

  6. comment
    Comment #26884149

    Replaceable batteries were superseded by batteries of sufficient capacity for 99% of users. (And for the remaining 1% I'm sure the non-Apple marketplace has fantastic, no-compromis…

  7. comment
    Comment #26883921

    This is true. Our hearing is well tuned for utility in a pre-modern context. They just don't have anything remotely like the precision of our eyesight, which can judge things like …

  8. comment
    Comment #26883306

    I am not confusing the two. In a band-limited signal, the Shannon-Nyquist theorem mathematically proves that the sampling rate is the frequency resolution. It also proves that when…

  9. comment
    Comment #26883277

    For me bedsheets are their own wash cycle, so there’s nothing to stack them with. I just carry them upstairs and dump them into the blanket box when they're done. No need for a bas…

  10. comment
    Comment #26875661

    > 128k MP3s Twenty years ago, such files would have been barely listenable. Ten years ago, this would have been tolerable but obviously compromised. Today, with the best encoders, …

  11. comment
    Comment #26875624

    The crucial difference is that compared to our other senses, our ears are really, really, astonishingly shit. They can be highly precise in one context and ludicrously imprecise in…

  12. comment
    Comment #26875566

    And more stress on the speaker/tweeter drivers. Of course, when you look at these high resolution recordings, the amplitude of material above 20kHz is piddling. The amount of harmo…

  13. comment
    Comment #26875501

    I believe you are sincere. But I think that if you were able to run a sufficiently rigorous blind test (note: precise level matching is critical ) you'd surprise yourself.

  14. comment
    Comment #26875469

    > It definitely sounded different, I heard things in songs that I've listened to for years that I've not heard before. That usually means one of two things— 1. the frequency respon…

  15. comment
    Comment #26871007

    Again yes, that’s exactly my point. They are double dipping on the good will; first as an employee perk, second on their corporate annual reports.

  16. comment
    Comment #26869750

    I never understood the need to fold bed sheets. Crinkled sheets simply aren’t a problem I’ve ever had; you barely notice the difference once they’re stretched over the bed and pill…

  17. comment
    Comment #26850343

    That’s my point. The donation is financially a corporate donation, but is being marketed to the employee as a perk of their employment. That it’s “their” donation.

  18. comment
    Comment #26848706

    And then the accountants probably tabulated them as corporate donations. So were they gifts from the employee or not?

  19. comment
    Comment #26841253

    Not every website requires retention of every person in order to survive. In my case, my website is better because my user base is tolerant of a bit of jank. I consider it a win wh…

  20. comment
    Comment #26840928

    Exactly this. I have no desire to develop against the most bleeding edge target. Thanks for explaining this better than I could.

  21. comment
    Comment #26840898

    It's no matter; I'm not here for the points. Personally I find it hilarious to be down-voted for stating plain facts about my own (demonstrably effective) development process.

  22. comment
    Comment #26840882

    You do realise that my “about” is a joke, right? Regardless, I’m self-employed and my website makes enough money that I can spend plenty of time arguing with people on the Internet…

  23. comment
    Comment #26839894

    HTTPS is necessary. QUIC is not. It’s going to be a long time before any site requires QUIC in order to work.

  24. comment
    Comment #26818575

    I just don’t like the idea of having my own devices conspire against me to compromise my own privacy.

  25. comment
    Comment #26818548

    As a web developer I don’t test in Chrome—I develop against Firefox and sanity check using Safari iOS. Therefore my site is explicitly optimised for Firefox. Chrome users might exp…