Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — sintaks

sintaks

HN member
Joined
Wed, Jun 06, 2012, 4:33 PM UTC
HN karma
70
Public activity
27 items

About sintaks

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #13408327

    Smart man. :)

  2. story
  3. comment
    Comment #4420403

    I get it - but I'm arguing that the amount of egress traffic Glacier customers (in aggregate) are likely to drive is nothing in comparison to what S3 and/or EC2 already does (in ag…

  4. comment
    Comment #4420362

    That would definitely be cool. Pretty unlikely, however. When it comes to hardware, they like to keep each service's resources separate. While a given box or rack many handle many …

  5. comment
    Comment #4420295

    Ah, right - definitely.

  6. comment
    Comment #4420288

    Not saying it couldn't be very useful for the data-heavy consumer. Just guessing this is more of an enterprise play than anything else. :)

  7. comment
    Comment #4418826

    It may not make sense today. Amazon is notorious for betting on the far future. They're also raising the bar on what archival data storage services could offer. When you ship your …

  8. comment
    Comment #4416300

    I don't think they're loss-leadering on storage, but if they are, they don't think they will be for long. AWS (EC2 and S3 in particular) does very well when it comes to profit marg…

  9. comment
    Comment #4416271

    Almost spot on. See: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4416065

  10. comment
    Comment #4416265

    Close. Tiered, yes. But remember who we're talking about. First, no tape. The areal storage density of tape is lower than hard disks. Too many moving parts involved. Too hard to pe…

  11. comment
    Comment #4416228

    See my post up top: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4416065

  12. comment
    Comment #4416224

    Data cryonics indeed. One of the early names kicked around (and, indeed, its working name for over a year) was Cold Storage .

  13. comment
    Comment #4416218

    Yes. The forthcoming S3 Lifecycle Policy API additions should allow for exactly this, automatically.

  14. comment
    Comment #4416214

    Dropbox stores their stuff in S3 a little different. It's not a 1:1 correspondence between user files and objects under Dropbox's S3 account. The fact that they use S3 as their bac…

  15. comment
    Comment #4416208

    He could just turn on object versioning.

  16. comment
  17. comment
    Comment #4416112

    Amazon has ridiculous internal bandwidth. The costly bit is external. The time delay is largely internal buffer time - they need to pull your data out of Glacier (a somewhat slow p…

  18. comment
    Comment #4416091

    Why wouldn't they stage in S3? :)

  19. comment
  20. comment
    Comment #4416065

    Former S3 employee here. I was on my way out of the company just after the storage engineering work was completed, before they had finalized the API design and pricing structure, s…

  21. story
  22. comment
    Comment #4318505

    Curious video. While sketching out Google's Gmail UI, they place a sticky over the advertisement area that says, "Creepy ads." Yet what do I see upon logging in to Outlook.com? Cra…

  23. comment
    Comment #4317964

    Wait, so 95% of your customers experience a TTFB of less than 500 microseconds (tp95 of 450 microseconds)? I just want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly. Because that's …

  24. comment
    Comment #4316161

    I must say - that kind of perf is superb, though top percentile and averages aren't super representative of the average customer's experience. What are your tp50 and tp90 like? You…

  25. comment
    Comment #4316073

    Also, that "2 billion requests per day" might sound silly to someone who serves that in an hour...