Viewing profile — sintaks
sintaks
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Jun 06, 2012, 4:33 PM UTC
- HN karma
- 70
- Public activity
- 27 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About sintaks
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #13408327
Smart man. :)
- story
-
comment
Comment #4420403
I get it - but I'm arguing that the amount of egress traffic Glacier customers (in aggregate) are likely to drive is nothing in comparison to what S3 and/or EC2 already does (in ag…
-
comment
Comment #4420362
That would definitely be cool. Pretty unlikely, however. When it comes to hardware, they like to keep each service's resources separate. While a given box or rack many handle many …
-
comment
Comment #4420295
Ah, right - definitely.
-
comment
Comment #4420288
Not saying it couldn't be very useful for the data-heavy consumer. Just guessing this is more of an enterprise play than anything else. :)
-
comment
Comment #4418826
It may not make sense today. Amazon is notorious for betting on the far future. They're also raising the bar on what archival data storage services could offer. When you ship your …
-
comment
Comment #4416300
I don't think they're loss-leadering on storage, but if they are, they don't think they will be for long. AWS (EC2 and S3 in particular) does very well when it comes to profit marg…
-
comment
Comment #4416271
Almost spot on. See: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4416065
-
comment
Comment #4416265
Close. Tiered, yes. But remember who we're talking about. First, no tape. The areal storage density of tape is lower than hard disks. Too many moving parts involved. Too hard to pe…
-
comment
Comment #4416228
See my post up top: http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4416065
-
comment
Comment #4416224
Data cryonics indeed. One of the early names kicked around (and, indeed, its working name for over a year) was Cold Storage .
-
comment
Comment #4416218
Yes. The forthcoming S3 Lifecycle Policy API additions should allow for exactly this, automatically.
-
comment
Comment #4416214
Dropbox stores their stuff in S3 a little different. It's not a 1:1 correspondence between user files and objects under Dropbox's S3 account. The fact that they use S3 as their bac…
-
comment
Comment #4416208
He could just turn on object versioning.
- comment
-
comment
Comment #4416112
Amazon has ridiculous internal bandwidth. The costly bit is external. The time delay is largely internal buffer time - they need to pull your data out of Glacier (a somewhat slow p…
-
comment
Comment #4416091
Why wouldn't they stage in S3? :)
- comment
-
comment
Comment #4416065
Former S3 employee here. I was on my way out of the company just after the storage engineering work was completed, before they had finalized the API design and pricing structure, s…
- story
-
comment
Comment #4318505
Curious video. While sketching out Google's Gmail UI, they place a sticky over the advertisement area that says, "Creepy ads." Yet what do I see upon logging in to Outlook.com? Cra…
-
comment
Comment #4317964
Wait, so 95% of your customers experience a TTFB of less than 500 microseconds (tp95 of 450 microseconds)? I just want to make sure I'm understanding you correctly. Because that's …
-
comment
Comment #4316161
I must say - that kind of perf is superb, though top percentile and averages aren't super representative of the average customer's experience. What are your tp50 and tp90 like? You…
-
comment
Comment #4316073
Also, that "2 billion requests per day" might sound silly to someone who serves that in an hour...