Viewing profile — simplefish
simplefish
HN member- Joined
- Wed, Feb 08, 2012, 12:36 AM UTC
- HN karma
- 132
- Public activity
- 44 items
- HN profile
- View on Hacker News ↗
About simplefish
No profile information was provided.
Recent public activity
-
comment
Comment #40572721
I interviewed at a company known for consistently asking one of the same four questions in a specific interview round. These questions were widely shared on forums like Blind, Leet…
-
comment
Comment #6869791
I'm confused by the way you say something is "technically" true, then claim you believe it isn not true. Are you really saying that you believe things you know aren't true? > How m…
-
comment
Comment #6558332
> My point is that raising people out of poverty should not be used as a measurement of a systems [...] success. I have no words.
-
comment
Comment #6551820
> Your arguments are quite flawed as they could be applied in favour of feudalism or plain cattle slavery. Not at all. I could make some solid suggestions for proven ways of improv…
-
comment
Comment #6541769
It's easy to stand on the sidelines and hurl brickbats at a system (global capitalism) which has raised more people out of grinding poverty in a shorter time than everything else w…
-
comment
Comment #4187123
So let's summarize: The Indian government spends billions of dollars (which are desperately needed for other purposes in a poor country like India) propping up the price of wheat. …
-
comment
Comment #3919054
I...see. Let's recap: You said that wealth should not be equated with job creation. I said that this was wrong, and it should be. You admit that this is true (and indeed, that it i…
-
comment
Comment #3912542
There's not much to elaborate on; the argument literally makes no sense as presented. You say "wealth is better thought-of as a measure of how many jobs the owner of a company coul…
-
comment
Comment #3912095
I'm not sure what you said you be any less true. You seem to have no understanding of how a modern economy works, or how the banking system works, or what a salary represents, or w…
-
comment
Comment #3907089
I'm struggling to believe that you really didn't notice the sarcasm in my comment. :) Obviously you can swap all the names on the list for right wing equivalents; it would be just …
-
comment
Comment #3905679
I agree. Corporations are not people, and should have no rights; in particular they should have no rights to free speech or property. I look forward to a day when the government sh…
-
comment
Comment #3816245
Ridiculous strawmen sure are fun to demolish, aren't they? Who needs logic or accuracy?
-
comment
Comment #3769517
Um. I don't mean to be nit-picky, but that proposal isn't going to do anything. Let me explain. The proposal is to prevent new power plants from producing more than 1,000 pounds of…
-
comment
Comment #3742389
grins I hope some of the more credulous commenters here on HN[1] like the taste of crow. Especially the ones that attacked other commenters as being closed-minded for pointing out …
-
comment
Comment #3722989
The policy he advocated can be spun in a way that sounds socialist. Phrased the way he did it though? No, that's not going to get you labeled "socialist" anywhere.
-
comment
Comment #3715382
"There's always someone who speaks at great length about finance while being clueless about the subject. [...] And no, Glass-Steagall doesn't have anything to do with offering inte…
-
comment
Comment #3715139
My point is fairly narrow: People love to blame Glass-Steagall, and yet consider the roll call of shame during the GFC: Northern Rock, Bear Stearns, Countrywide, Fannie Mae, Freddi…
-
comment
Comment #3712453
Heh. First, Commondreams is not necessarily the best source for a citation. Let's turn to Wikipedia, which explains the Citibank/Travelers merger is fairly decent detail[1]. In sho…
-
comment
Comment #3711274
Actually, no, most people are NOT familiar with the repeal of Glass-Steagall (not Glass-Steagal, incidentally). Including you; if you were you'd realize that there's no coherent ar…
-
comment
Comment #3711092
The point of the article is that observational studies are terrible and non-scientific, but people seize on them anyhow if they like the conclusions. You reply by saying, in essenc…
-
comment
Comment #3706446
This stuff is actually not as hard as you seem to be making it. We don't need all these "some believe" or "seem like" qualifirs. First, what do we mean by "global inequality"? Well…
-
comment
Comment #3700612
This is not true. Your ideal universal system may ration on medical need. There might even be one in existence that does so... ...but I really doubt it.
-
comment
Comment #3697602
"I don't think we are conquering global inequality. I think it's getting worse." I'm sure you think that, but the numbers are clear, and not really under any dispute. Global inequa…
-
comment
Comment #3697213
I'm not sure why you seem surprised; this is a very long standing trend. It's also pretty obvious. You aren't the only one to value quality of life over quantity; in fact everyone …
- comment