Live data from Hacker News

Viewing profile — simplefish

simplefish

HN member
Joined
Wed, Feb 08, 2012, 12:36 AM UTC
HN karma
132
Public activity
44 items

About simplefish

No profile information was provided.

Recent public activity

  1. comment
    Comment #40572721

    I interviewed at a company known for consistently asking one of the same four questions in a specific interview round. These questions were widely shared on forums like Blind, Leet…

  2. comment
    Comment #6869791

    I'm confused by the way you say something is "technically" true, then claim you believe it isn not true. Are you really saying that you believe things you know aren't true? > How m…

  3. comment
    Comment #6558332

    > My point is that raising people out of poverty should not be used as a measurement of a systems [...] success. I have no words.

  4. comment
    Comment #6551820

    > Your arguments are quite flawed as they could be applied in favour of feudalism or plain cattle slavery. Not at all. I could make some solid suggestions for proven ways of improv…

  5. comment
    Comment #6541769

    It's easy to stand on the sidelines and hurl brickbats at a system (global capitalism) which has raised more people out of grinding poverty in a shorter time than everything else w…

  6. comment
    Comment #4187123

    So let's summarize: The Indian government spends billions of dollars (which are desperately needed for other purposes in a poor country like India) propping up the price of wheat. …

  7. comment
    Comment #3919054

    I...see. Let's recap: You said that wealth should not be equated with job creation. I said that this was wrong, and it should be. You admit that this is true (and indeed, that it i…

  8. comment
    Comment #3912542

    There's not much to elaborate on; the argument literally makes no sense as presented. You say "wealth is better thought-of as a measure of how many jobs the owner of a company coul…

  9. comment
    Comment #3912095

    I'm not sure what you said you be any less true. You seem to have no understanding of how a modern economy works, or how the banking system works, or what a salary represents, or w…

  10. comment
    Comment #3907089

    I'm struggling to believe that you really didn't notice the sarcasm in my comment. :) Obviously you can swap all the names on the list for right wing equivalents; it would be just …

  11. comment
    Comment #3905679

    I agree. Corporations are not people, and should have no rights; in particular they should have no rights to free speech or property. I look forward to a day when the government sh…

  12. comment
    Comment #3816245

    Ridiculous strawmen sure are fun to demolish, aren't they? Who needs logic or accuracy?

  13. comment
    Comment #3769517

    Um. I don't mean to be nit-picky, but that proposal isn't going to do anything. Let me explain. The proposal is to prevent new power plants from producing more than 1,000 pounds of…

  14. comment
    Comment #3742389

    grins I hope some of the more credulous commenters here on HN[1] like the taste of crow. Especially the ones that attacked other commenters as being closed-minded for pointing out …

  15. comment
    Comment #3722989

    The policy he advocated can be spun in a way that sounds socialist. Phrased the way he did it though? No, that's not going to get you labeled "socialist" anywhere.

  16. comment
    Comment #3715382

    "There's always someone who speaks at great length about finance while being clueless about the subject. [...] And no, Glass-Steagall doesn't have anything to do with offering inte…

  17. comment
    Comment #3715139

    My point is fairly narrow: People love to blame Glass-Steagall, and yet consider the roll call of shame during the GFC: Northern Rock, Bear Stearns, Countrywide, Fannie Mae, Freddi…

  18. comment
    Comment #3712453

    Heh. First, Commondreams is not necessarily the best source for a citation. Let's turn to Wikipedia, which explains the Citibank/Travelers merger is fairly decent detail[1]. In sho…

  19. comment
    Comment #3711274

    Actually, no, most people are NOT familiar with the repeal of Glass-Steagall (not Glass-Steagal, incidentally). Including you; if you were you'd realize that there's no coherent ar…

  20. comment
    Comment #3711092

    The point of the article is that observational studies are terrible and non-scientific, but people seize on them anyhow if they like the conclusions. You reply by saying, in essenc…

  21. comment
    Comment #3706446

    This stuff is actually not as hard as you seem to be making it. We don't need all these "some believe" or "seem like" qualifirs. First, what do we mean by "global inequality"? Well…

  22. comment
    Comment #3700612

    This is not true. Your ideal universal system may ration on medical need. There might even be one in existence that does so... ...but I really doubt it.

  23. comment
    Comment #3697602

    "I don't think we are conquering global inequality. I think it's getting worse." I'm sure you think that, but the numbers are clear, and not really under any dispute. Global inequa…

  24. comment
    Comment #3697213

    I'm not sure why you seem surprised; this is a very long standing trend. It's also pretty obvious. You aren't the only one to value quality of life over quantity; in fact everyone …

  25. comment