Viewing profile — simpleblend

Safe assumption.

https://martinwecke.de/108/#A0E02G2I01O3P2

Not an argument.

You would think that if the world is truly on the brink of devastation, it would be at least worthy of TRYING nuclear power.

This is the key. They don't want the third-world to industrialize.

"The motte-and-bailey fallacy (named after the motte-and-bailey castle) is a form of argument and an informal fallacy where an arguer conflates two positions that share similaritie…

Wait, so how is that hate speech?

If you think that's the only piece evidence, I strongly suggest you keep looking. I'm not even a right-winger and it's obvious to me.

The FBI is notoriously subversive, regardless of the political denomination.

Right, so instead of exposing themselves legally they do an end run of telling Twitter to ban and writing smear campaigns. Which is they did to Dr. Jay Bhattacharya of Stanford and…

No. The FBI is prioritizing certain things and not prioritizing others. They're doing this for political reasons, which should outrage everyone. But it doesn't outrage you because …

So Twitter needs to bad them all for you to be convinced?

Stating facts is not hate speech -- especially if you're trying to force society to go along with your unreality for political reasons.

Francis Collins and Fauci specifically targeted those two doctors.

Because leftists often use that as an example of hate speech.

Exactly

So, did you just not read the rest of my comment?

I have a really hard time believing Twitter would have reacted in similar way if an individual or company initiated the same takedowns

1. We're not talking about your company which probably had a different context. We're talking about the FBI telling Twitter to silence opinions and facts. 2. Whether you agree with…

Good point

Exactly. Well put.

Who is saying that people should be harmed? Seriously. Whoever you have in mind, if they're actually advocating violence against people then I'm in agreement with you. That's not c…